User talk:Nauman.afridi33

June 2022

Your edit to Budgerigar has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Cannolis (talk) 15:57, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Sources

Hello Nauman.afridi33 please find more bird care sources. While I can see you don't spam references from solely one source – for which you might be blocked – you don't use enough variety. Invasive Spices (talk) 18:35, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind update. As I was not aware of that rule. Can you please direct me to the resources and complete guideline for improving the quality of content on Wikipedia. as I find Wikipedia to be an invaluable resource and a great service to humanity. I want to be a part of such great organization. At times I see certain things which is completely inaccurate and when I try to change it I get a warning message. Is there any other way to report something like that or or change it without any warning?

I would really appreciate your help if you could point me in the right direction.

Thank you Nauman.afridi33 (talk) 10:21, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

There's nothing wrong with your improvements. You understand the idea of Wikipedia. Posting the same source is the problem. Invasive Spices (talk) 16:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Ada Jafri, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 22:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the guidance, I will definitely preview the content before posting next time. Nauman.afridi33 (talk) 09:27, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

A belated welcome

Hi Nauman.afridi33. A belated welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 19:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)