User talk:Nawarnory

I'd be interested talking more about robofaq offline.--Abebenjoe (talk) 15:29, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome!

Thank you for your interest, I really appreciate it. I am a big fan of seeing the impact of good content on people's lives on all aspects. Here's my email nawar@helpelves.ca , just drop me a line and we can continue the conversation from there.

Hello

While I'm sure your intentions are sincere and well-minded, what you are doing is against Wikipedia policy (in effect, spamming our talk pages). For this reason, I'm afraid I will have to report the activities of your account to the administrators, who will follow up. Wikipedia accounts are to facilitate building the encyclopedia, not for promotional purposes (well-intentioned though they might be). Good luck with your efforts, but please do not send out any more invitations. See WP:PROMO and especially the first point at WP:SPAMMER. Matt Deres (talk) 21:29, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you insert advertising or a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. No more soliciting on talk pages. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:33, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Spencer^T♦C 22:45, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nawarnory (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thanks for the note, I overlooked that part of the policy. I do understand that you are exercising your rights; however, my intentions were really well and I do understand that there's a thin line between being a spammer and not being one; however, unfortunately I was seen as one which I am not.
My edits were on the talk pages, which I've noticed that they aren't affecting the real visible content of Wikipedia; however, these talk pages are the only medium to communicate with the content creators which I didn't see any other replacement for it, and that's the reason I used them in the first place.
I have really great respect for Wikipedia's content and creators and there's nothing in it for me to sell or advertise except the desire to offer goodness to others. If you think there's someone, from Wikipedia or the Wikimedia foundation, that I should talk to about mutual work, then I am totally down for that. Nawar (and this is my real name) Nawarnory (talk) 4:47 am, Today (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

Wikipedia editors are here for the purpose of building an encyclopedia. You are here to attempt to gain contributors for your own project. Since you are not interested in using your ability to edit here for its intended purpose, that ability has been revoked. Unless you have suddenly developed an interest in contributing content to Wikipedia, rather than using it as a recruitment tool, the project is not served by allowing you to edit here, and your request to be unblocked is therefore declined. Yunshui 雲‍水 21:22, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.