User talk:Nayanmipun

Welcome!

Hello, Nayanmipun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Rjgodoy 08:55, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I moved Jatin mipun to User:Nayanmipun/Jatin mipun because it seems to be about a relative of yours. I thought it would have been deleted otherwise, because it fails to assert notability of its subject (criterion 7 in the criteria for speedy deletion). Keep it in your userpage (or a subpage of it), or enhance it and move it back to Jatin mipun. If you have any doubt, just ask me. Rjgodoy 08:55, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Child abuse article

You have been repeatedly reverted on adding abortion as a form of child abuse, such as here, because it's unsourced. It's also not a recognized form of child abuse among experts who study this topic as a profession. If you have any chance of abortion staying listed as a definitive form of child abuse in that article, then you need to support that text with a WP:Reliable source, specifically a WP:MEDRS-compliant source, stating that it is. Read those guidelines to see what Wikipedia considers a reliable source, and especially what Wikipedia considers a reliable medical-compliant source. Adding that abortion is a form a child abuse is a political hot topic, and, if kept at all in that article, should be added lower within it (in a section), with a reliable news source or reliable medical-compliant source stating that some people consider abortion a form of child abuse. Stop adding your unsourced addition. If you continue to do so, you will continue to be reverted and you will be reported at the appropriate Wikipedia venue for this misconduct. Also be aware of WP:Edit warring, especially WP:3RR. Flyer22 (talk) 19:21, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 20:11, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Three revert rule

I would like to inform you about our three-revert rule. It says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. At this point, you have several times reverted child abuse. Reverting once more will lead to a report to administrators. Please, either find a reliable source or stop adding your text! Lova Falk talk 19:47, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:03, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:11, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]