User talk:Neoge

October 2008

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Neotu Gallery, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:32, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Neoge. You have new messages at Fabrictramp's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Neotu Gallery has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Arakunem^Talk 02:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Neoge. You have new messages at Arakunem's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy for the following reason: your username suggests that you are a promoter of an article that you are working on. After you look over the policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

Thank you. Themfromspace (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

COI:N

I've listed the Neotu article for review at the conflict of interest noticeboard for further discussion. Please feel free to take part in the discussion and respect veteran users' input. Themfromspace (talk) 23:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Klamm...

Don't worry, the Wikipedia system is really open to all, once you learn the policies and guidelines. I'd suggest looking over this page, as well as the list of policies and list of guidelines. If you have any general questions about using Wikipedia, feel free to contact the help desk or the help page for new contributers. In reality, the best way to learn the ropes is just to get out there and edit! You'll learn from your editing mistakes faster than reading through Wikipedia's labarynth of policies, guidelines, essays, etc. Also, you can contact me or a Wikipedia administrator for help. Themfromspace (talk) 23:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Themfromspace thank you again. You are very encouraging.--Neoge (talk) 03:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My IP address was blocked. Please could you tell me why.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

The block has been fixed so that users with accounts (such as you) can edit through it.

Request handled by: PeterSymonds (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

It was apparently blocked because of some user using multiple accounts in this range (67.85.124.0-67.85.127.255) to get around) a block on some account. I don't know any more information - we have asked the blocking admin. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:08, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Od Mishehu thank you. But what should I do to solve this situation?--Neoge (talk) 03:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First, we will have to wait for an answer from the blocking admin. Once he answers, we will determine if we can reasonably trust you - if yes, and the block itself is reasonable, we can allow you to edit despite the block. However, we first need to wait for the blocking admin (PeterSymonds) to respond. Please wait patiently. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:20, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Od Mishehu. On the PeterSymonds' talk page you can find his answer to jpgordon who was asking him why my IP address was blocked. There is something wrong in PeterSymonds' answer. I do not know how to contact directly PeterSymonds because I am blocked and can only communicate from my talk page. Please could you help to get in touch with PeterSymonds in order to solve directly with him this problem. Thank you in advance.Neoge (talk)

I've already replied to his reply, explicitly mentioning you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]