User talk:Newdesignnow

Welcome!

Hello, Newdesignnow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Potash One, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! FlyingToaster 05:43, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Potash One

A tag has been placed on Potash One requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FlyingToaster 05:43, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Tirex Resources

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Tirex Resources, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.tirexresources.com/s/Home.asp, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Tirex Resources and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Tirex Resources with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Tirex Resources.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Tirex Resources saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Alvestrand (talk) 15:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm afraid that your temporary version also utilizes text directly from the company website, which we can only do if that text meets our non-free content criteria or if we receive permission by the processes described above. In addition to non-text components (lists of names are not governable by copyright protection unless they are creative--for example, a list of the "best drummers in the world" represents opinion in selection, so you could not duplicate that, but a list of scientists employed by a firm is just straightforward fact), there are only five sentences in the article. The first two were copied from http://www.tirexresources.com/s/Home.asp. The third duplicates the first. The fourth follows too closely on that site, with runs of identical text or superficial differences. The final sentence, "While there are 17 known historical deposits on Tirex’s property that were found during previous Albanian state-run exploration programs (9 of which were in production), Tirex is conducting the first ever large-scale, modern exploration of this District using modern geological interpretation, technology and techniques" seems to include some original text, but also draws text from other sources (for instance: "the first ever large scale modern exploration of this District" from http://www.midasletter.com/news/2008_Archive/08091001_Tirex-commences-drilling.php.) If you wish to rewrite this article, please do so completely in your own language. As long as the information comes from a cited source, you don't need to duplicate the language (and must not, to comply with our copyright policy.

Since both the original and temporary versions infringe on copyright, I am deleting them. This doesn't mean you can't write a new article in that space. If you choose to do and would like me to save you some time by giving you back the non-text elements (the infobox and lists), please let me know at my talk page. I'd be happy to provide those to you. But please also be aware that as you have been contracted to write this page by the company, you will need to proceed carefully to remain within our conflict of interest guidelines. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'll restore for you the non-text portions of the page and be right back to discuss your other questions. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sandboxed

Okay. I've placed it in a "sandbox" in your userspace for further development. You'll find it here: User:Newdesignnow/sandbox. When you get it into shape, it can be moved to article space by the process here: Help:Moving a page. This process is restricted to experienced contributors (not because it's hard, but because it has been abused by vandals), but the experience requirements are low; you should have plenty enough experience by the time you're ready. If you don't, just let me know, and I'll gladly move it for you.

In answer to your question, no, I'm afraid you can't put back exactly what you have. I work on copyright concerns on Wikipedia quite a lot, and I know it can be a pain to find original ways to phrase material, but unfortunately we have to unless the company is prepared to offer us permission as described above. Wikipedia tries not to utilize "fair use" allowances more than we must because our goal is to make our text usable by as many people in as many places as we can. Wikipedia's text can (and is) modified and reproduced commercially. While many companies are quite happy to have us include text on their services, they are not all happy to release their material into commercial domain without compensation. Any text you use that is taken from a source that is not public domain or otherwise licensed compatibly with our own GFDL must be marked with quotations mark and properly attributed, but these should be used only when necessary, for instance if there is no other way to put it or if it is expressing an opinion. (Since we try to be neutral here, we let reliable sources not connected to the subject express opinions about it.)

But the text you had should be fairly easy to reorganize, partially just by putting it in the standard order of a Wikipedia article:

For example as a start:

Tirex Resources is a Canadian mining company headquartered in Vancouver, Canada with focused efforts in Albania.^[1] Since year, the company has been investigating mining options on a 344 square kilometer property in the Mirditë District, interest in which it acquired in year.

^ Tirex Resources Ltd., Businessweek. Accessed on 2009-02-12.

I know little about mining companies, so I don't know if that's an accurate descriptor or not, but I hope that this will demonstrate how to put it in new language but still convey the same information. (And feel free to use any of the language above if it is useful to you.) Since you have an interest in developing this further, I'm watching your page and will be happy to discuss this further. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It's a good start, but there's a few issues that need addressing. The text: "Tirex Resources - we don't simply own a great project.. we own a great DISTRICT" is not appropriate by itself in a Wikipedia article, as it is not neutral. If it is the company's motto, you can quote it, if you attribute it (and cite it) and explain what it is. Even then, there's a chance that people will view it as promotional and object to it in article space. Obviously, we don't a host website for companies, and Wikipedia is not affiliated with the company, so any text that includes the word "we" is going to be inappropriate unless it's a direct quotation. Also in my sample text (which I'm glad has been useful to you), I wrote "acquired in year" with the thought that you could supply the year. :) I don't know it. As the article is now, I suspect that if you moved it into article space it would run into notability concerns. Ideally, you would offer more reliable sources that refer to the company; best are sources from newspapers and journals. Even if those are not available, you should include a sentence that makes clear what makes this particularly company of encyclopedic importance. That's a bit tricky to do without stepping over the line into promotion, which can get the article deleted for other reasons. It's best if you can say something neutrally about the company's accomplishments or standing. Since I don't know those things about this company, I'll offer some random examples: "Haversham's Haberdashery is the oldest hat shop in the greater London area, in continuous operation since 1762." "Since its inception, Public Properties Ltd. has expanded internationally, employing 300 realtors in 20 countries." The former is a strong assertion of notability. The latter, not so much. But an assertion like that is better than nothing. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:21, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bryan Slusarchuk

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bryan Slusarchuk, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unable to identify any coverage about the subject . . . coverage involving him was quotations in passing about the companies he works for—and most of those are press releases.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bongo matic 22:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bryan Slusarchuk

I have nominated Bryan Slusarchuk, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Slusarchuk. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Bongo matic 22:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Newdesignnow. You have new messages at Moonriddengirl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reward Board

Is your reward board offer still valid? If so, please email me using the link Special:EmailUser/AndrewRT. Regards, AndrewRT(Talk) 22:17, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am interested in your reward board posting. please email at Special:EmailUser/Sadads. I have experience in this, thanks SADADS (talk) 00:09, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tirex

Howdy, I placed some sources on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Newdesignnow/sandbox that may help you out. Drop me a note if you need further help. Joe407 (talk) 19:13, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Tirex Resources Ltd., Businessweek. Accessed on 2009-02-12.

[1]