User talk:Nicholas Eastop

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Nicholas Eastop - Scenkonstmuseet! Thank you for your contributions. I am SarekOfVulcan and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome indeed!

I saw your recent brass-related edits and was very excited to realize that you are an editor here. Your name - both yours and that of other family members! - came up very recently in brassy conversation (as it were) round our kitchen table. I feel that we're very lucky to have you involved, and will look forward to seeing more from you in the future. With best wishes, DBaK (talk) 18:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request of article move

Hi Nicholas!

Could you please move the article about Carl Oscar Boije af Gennäs from my sandbox to article name space.--Susanne biblioteket musikverket (talk) 15:13, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jens Bjørn-Larsen (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SeraphWiki was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

coeurope source fails verification

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jens Bjørn-Larsen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jens Bjørn-Larsen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SeraphWiki (talk) 03:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nicholas Eastop - Scenkonstmuseet, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SeraphWiki (talk) 03:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jens Bjørn-Larsen (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HighKing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still falls short of the criteria for establishing notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jens Bjørn-Larsen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jens Bjørn-Larsen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HighKing⁺⁺ 22:15, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jens Bjørn-Larsen

Hello, Nicholas Eastop - Scenkonstmuseet. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jens Bjørn-Larsen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 14:52, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Toxic (song), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Doctorhawkes (talk) 10:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

I know the contractor for Stockholm Session Strings, as well as many of the musicians. What sort of documentation and/or sources would be required to substantiate this info? Nicholas Eastop (talk) 10:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Something published by a reliable source. Newspapers, liner notes, etc. Doctorhawkes (talk) 02:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]