User talk:Nickyjamz

Fake article about yourself

I greatly trimmed your user page because it violated the guidelines found at WP:UP#PROMO and WP:FAKEARTICLE. Wikipedia is not here for your personal promotion. All of your edits have been to this page about yourself, including images you uploaded to promote yourself, and you even posted an image of yourself over the Hubble Space Telescope image at File:Star.jpg. If you are notable as a musical artist you can have your own biography article on Wikipedia but only in mainspace, not your userpage. Binksternet (talk) 04:35, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Nickyjamz2.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Nickyjamz2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:46, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Nickyjamz.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Nickyjamz.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:47, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Please do not continue to upload files with missing or false information on their copyright status, as you did with File:Nickyjamz.jpg. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Images and other media must only be uploaded if they meet the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:47, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nickyj.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Nickyj.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 04:47, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Nickyjamz4.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nickyjamz4.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Nickyjamz3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nickyjamz3.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

Hey. I just reviewed a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard about your userpage being written like an advertisement. From what I see, it does look that way. Is this a draft that you eventually plan on making an article? If so, I should warn you that it will most likely be deleted very quickly for a few different reasons. If you want help writing an article, I can help you. If it's just meant to be your userpage, it's going to have to go according to WP:UP#PROMO and WP:FAKEARTICLE.

If you have any questions, ask them here and I'll do my best to answer them. OlYeller21^Talktome 13:42, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nickyjamz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Nickyjamz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ukexpat (talk) 16:10, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]