User talk:Nilgsson

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Nilgsson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 10:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KSW XII

Dawid Baziak is from Germany on Sherdog and a member of team M-1 Global Team Germany here http://www.m-1global.com/lang/en/2009/06/17/david-baziak/ so quit reverting my edits, that is why im erasing the flag. I cannot find my source for Maxim but Grishin is a Belarusian name and he trains with Andrei Arvolski and Freddy Roach in Belarus. Also if you look at any opponant Maxim has fought his nationality is Belarus on any of their records, i.e Baga Agaev. Sepulwiki 18:17, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

I guess it just add the Polish flag like before, and also the Grishin situation is simliar to this one, as Grishin is Belarusian but fights out of Russia because he is in Red Devil Sport Club. Sepulwiki 18:49, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello and welcome Nilgsson! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

reply

To illustrate my problem. Let me pretend that this my 12th edit numerically and my 15th overall. How can this be? If numerically I have made 12 edits. Then Ive made 12 edits. You can count these 12 edits in lots of ways but its a challenge to make them 15. Victuallers (talk) 17:04, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

You don't need to keep doing this. It's not like there's a rush of people trying to create poor quality articles on Polish MMA. Paralympiakos (talk) 13:19, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It just gets in the way. In the past, I redirected a few UFC events because we were getting poor quality attempts, but this was upon a request from a higher-upper. There's no need in these redirects, because usually people do it to block others from creating the article about the person. It seems as though you might be doing that. All it has done now is prevent me from creating the article on that person. P.s. most people usually keep all discussions in the same place. It makes discussions easier. Just a little heads up. Paralympiakos (talk) 22:34, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah...isn't that exactly what you did with the Jewtuszko article??

If you wanted to create the Górski article - why didn't you just do so by editing the content? I don't see how the redirection blocks anything. Anyway, the Górski article already exists.

Also, check out our Jewtuszko discussion - I suppose you didn't read my last response Nilgsson (talk) 22:59, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The difference, Nilgsson, is that Jewtuszko is a WEC fighter. We get appauling stubs for UFC/WEC fighters all the time. It's to prevent poor creation, not "keep it safe for later" as you're doing. Just keep it in mind, ok? Paralympiakos (talk) 23:01, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on. While I admitted, that my Jewtuszko creation was - well let's call it 'lacking' (because created in a haste), the reason you stated removing it was, that it failed notability. Not poor content. If the fighter was unnotable in your opinion, why bother with that redirection in the first place? Because he will be notable later? It doesn't make any sense other than plain blocking for future purposes that you talked about above. And I wouldn't even get the idea by myself to redirect anything before creating without you showing me. Btw, my creation was done in such a haste because I kind of got sad, that someone did that to an article that I already have been gathering information for - it doesn't matter now, but if it wasn't for the redirection on Jewtuszko, I would have created a full and informative page just a few days later.

Have you read my last response in the Jewtuszko discussion? It's about Błachowicz. Also my friend wrote a good article about him on sherdog just a few days ago. It's sourced in the article. Nilgsson (talk) 23:27, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The original creation shouldn't have been lacking though. If you're going to create it, create it in one go. I think I read the last response to the Blachowicz stuff, yeah. I saw the Sherdog article. Made me smile a little. It's quite funny that a few of my recent article creations are being signed by bigger organisation (Nick Pace, Edson Barboza) or being mentioned in the media. Paralympiakos (talk) 23:35, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KSW XIV

It is common practice to remove the references on the matches after the match has taken place as there is no reason to maintain a future reference to a match that has taken place. Check UFC pages before and after the fight takes place and you will notice that. Udar55 (talk) 13:51, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that is reasonable. Just be sure not to remove important references, that are still valuable ;) Nilgsson (talk) 18:06, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KSW and Marcin Najman

Man, Marcin Najman was runner-up of Polish Boxing Championships in 2008. He lost to Andrzej Wawrzyk. It makes him notable as boxer. Why do you still think it doesn't make him notable? Regards --ArkadiuszEurope (talk) 17:05, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kolego, proszę bez żartów. Just look at his boxing record, it is stuffed with...well, some of the worst boxers in Europe - only one of them had more wins than defeats. Najman had just one quality opponent (Wawrzyk) and lost that fight getting KTFO. And he got the runner-up spot because people know him from reality shows in TV, not because he deserved it with his skills or achievements. He is not a notable boxer, just maybe a notable celebrity.

Furthermore, we do not talk about boxing here, but about MMA. And Najman is a complete zero, or even worse, when it comes to MMA. Probably the worst competitor at KSW ever. Nilgsson (talk) 14:57, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KSW Extra 2

The article KSW Extra 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sourced only to own site, no indication that this will or does meet WP:EVENT

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mt king ^(edits) 03:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]