User talk:Nishadlalit4

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to World Divyang T10. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

and please do not move this back. Consensus is clear that the article is not ready. Repeat recreations will lead to possible blocks. Star Mississippi 13:34, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Indian Premier League into World Divyang T10. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 01:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Para Cricket Association of India moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Para Cricket Association of India, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption.

Important! There is a large number of links in the "references" section, and most of them are not reliable sources. Almost none of them is presented in a way that is helpful to the reader (it looks like the same titles were copied and pasted, regardless of what the actual source title is), and there is no indication of which source supports which info. Do not simply add every single web page that mentions the association as a source. Make sure the source is actually reliable and independent.

Finally, please remove the marketing style text. The entire "Objectives" section reads like a promotional webpage belonging to the organisation, and not like an encyclopaedia article.

When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 18:57, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

can u tell me please what is wrong to pramote disable cricket ,the para cricket association governing body of world divyang t10 Nishadlalit4 (talk) 05:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

nothing copy and past .all news associate each other Nishadlalit4 (talk) 05:20, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But Wikipedia cannot be used to promote anything. Wikipedia articles summarise information that has already been published in reliable sources that are not connected to the subject. What the organisation says about themselves, for instance their objectives, is not something that should be copied into Wikipedia. And Wikipedia articles should be about topics that are "notable" according to Wikipedia's definition. For organisations, that means they have to meet these criteria. Sources such as press releases, that are not independent of the organisation, can only be used to confirm specific details. They do not show that the organisation is notable. --bonadea contributions talk 09:16, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As for nothing copy and past .all news associate each other, I'm sorry, I can't quite understand what you mean. If the same text is published in different newspapers or on different online news portals, Wikipedia does not use all of them as sources. When I said "it looks like the same titles were copied and pasted", what I meant was this:

Right now, four of the links in the draft are called "Indian actor rajpal yadav acquires the mumbai team". But when I follow the four links, the title of this one is "Rajpal Yadav acquires the Mumbai Team for Season 2 of World Divyang T10 Premier League", the title of this one is "अभिनेता राजपाल यादव ने खरीदी दिव्यांग क्रिकेट लीग की मुंबई टीम", the title of this one is "World Divyang T10 Premier League, Rajpal Yadav acquires the Mumbai Team", and the title of this one is "World Disabled Premiere T10: اداکار راجپال یادیو نے دیویانگ کرکٹ لیگ کی ممبئی فرچائزی خریدی". None of them is actually called "Indian actor Rajpal Yadav acquires the Mumbai team". In addition to this, of those four sources, the two that are in English are almost identical, and the other two contain the exact same information as well. All four are obviously based on the same press release. Like I said above, that means Wikipedia should not include more than one of those sources, and they do not show that the organisation is notable. The same thing happens again with many of the other links.

Each reference should have the actual title of the source.
There can not be more than one copy of each source, even if they are published in different places, or in different languages.
Press releases do not show that the organisation is notable.
Sources should be connected to the text in the Wikipedia article, by using footnotes to show which information can be found in which source. There is a tutorial here, which shows you how to do that. --bonadea contributions talk 09:16, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

this is not big problem we are update this if this is main issue. Nishadlalit4 (talk) 09:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, you did not fix any of the issues except to remove a few copies of the identical sources, and you changed a couple of titles (but not to the actual title). But there were still several copies of multiple sources. You did not try to fix the promotional language, you did not add any footnotes, and the sources still do not show that the organisation is notable. It's important that you do not create articles in mainspace about your organisation or the athletes you representand that you do not move drafts to mainspace yourself, because you have a conflict of interest. (Now that you are blocked, you should not make any edits to Wikipedia at all – you are not allowed to create new accounts, or to edit without logging in, for as long as your account is blocked.) --bonadea contributions talk 13:35, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion, as you did at The Para Cricket Association of India.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please share where i do pramotion let me know also share me the link Nishadlalit4 (talk) 11:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i think if you have more knowledge then me kindly help bcz im working here only for divyang and para player nothing else Nishadlalit4 (talk) 11:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nishadlalit4, as far as I can see you've nothing but attempt to promote these organisations since you started editing. It's clear that you have a conflict of interest or a paid connection to these topics, but you've made no appropriate disclosure. You were clearly warned here not to move the Divyang page to mainspace, and that doing so might result in a block, but went ahead and made this move. If you want to be unblocked please follow the instructions in the dirty yellow template above. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:53, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you say "we are update this" above? How many people have access to this account? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dear only 2 people handle this if u think that we are promote so its just unfortunately happen .so please help to me from both page main space .we learn every day about wiki. we are hoping better response Nishadlalit4 (talk) 12:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

there is no paid pramotion Nishadlalit4 (talk) 05:19, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]