User talk:Nlochard

Welcome!

Hello, Nlochard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Brooke bailey, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Darkness Shines (talk) 00:36, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brooke bailey

The article Brooke bailey has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Darkness Shines (talk) 00:36, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brooke Bailey

The article Brooke Bailey has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 01:30, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brooke Bailey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brooke Bailey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Bailey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 19:46, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Brooke Bailey. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 20:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Brooke Bailey, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 20:43, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Brooke Bailey. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tgeairn (talk) 21:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Brooke Bailey. Tgeairn (talk) 21:50, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Brooke Bailey. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 23:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Everything else you have gotten on this topic has been an automated message from a tool or robot editor that has replaced the deletion tag you keep removing from this article. This is a real message from a real person, typed out just for you.

Do not remove the Articles for Deletion" notice from the top of this article. Doing so is considered vandalism and will result in you being blocked from further editing. And even more importantly, it will not stop the potential deletion of the article. If you want to argue why this article should not be deleted, then contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke_Bailey. Thanks! Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 23:41, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. This block is as a result of repeated removal of AfD templates despite ample warnings. Initially you are blocked for 24 hours but a much longer block will be implemented if your actions are repeated. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TerriersFan (talk) 00:58, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]