Jump to content

User talk:NotHelpingMatters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding vandalism of Futanari[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --/人 ‿‿ 人\ 署名の宣言 17:50, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at WP:ANI, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. diff  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NotHelpingMatters, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi NotHelpingMatters! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013[edit]

Your recent editing history at Futanari shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Darkness Shines (talk) 00:33, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 00:44, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Futanari, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Ryulong (琉竜) 01:36, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing including edit-warring in violation of WP:NOTCENSORED. From your contributions and comments it is clear that you are not here to improve the encyclopedia - someone less generous might well call it deliberatly trolling.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  The Bushranger One ping only 01:48, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]