User talk:OddHerring
Hello, OddHerring, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 06:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
Warning
[edit]
Hi OddHerring! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Template:History of Poland several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Template talk:History of Poland, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Merangs (talk) 23:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Spurious edit war warning on my talkpage
[edit]As an editor of several years, you should already be aware that a single revert in an article is not edit warring. I reverted your edit to several "Template:History of <country>" pages and gave a reason. A coat of arms is tied to a very specific period. A map is far more generic and suitable for a history template that could be applied to an article of any era, as it pertains to the land involved, and not a period specific symbol. WP:BRD would be a sensible next step, not instantly reverting me and putting a spurious edit warring warning on my talk page. I see another editor has issues with your revert behaviour as well. Please act more collegiately. (Hohum @) 18:51, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your message, and sorry, I didn't really read the edit warring guidelines before I posted that. I created my account several years ago, but only started editing this year. I'm reading the guidelines as I get more involved, but not very actively. I've been burned many times by entering online communities quickly, getting very invested, and discovering too late that they don't give a damn about (or actively hate) members that aren't part of the "special group" and will kick me out over petty nonsense, wasting my time and mental energy.
- As for the arms being too specific, I wanted to use arms that could represent all (or most) of that countries history, but the "another editor" you are referring to seemed to disagree. I also really hate the maps, they're just generally ugly on a website like this, a lot of them are barely recognizable, they just scream "2009 leftovers" for some reason; probably it's because that's when they're from. Almost all of my contributions have been about replacing old COA and trying to standardize the Sodacan-Heralder style, so removing the maps was a logical extension of that. OddHerring (talk) 19:39, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Before making a widespread change to history templates, I suggest raising the idea at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject History. There was likely a reason they chose maps instead of crests. They may agree that crests are better, but that would be the place to get honest feedback and consensus on it. (Hohum @) 20:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Alright, I'm just going to drop the matter if that's what I'm being asked to do. I'm not going to attend committee meetings and petition councils for permission to change an image file. Ridiculous. No wonder this thing is so half-baked. OddHerring (talk) 20:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- That isn't what I suggested, or what is required. I advised seeking advice and cooperating with other editors interested in history articles. (Hohum @) 20:34, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Alright, I'm just going to drop the matter if that's what I'm being asked to do. I'm not going to attend committee meetings and petition councils for permission to change an image file. Ridiculous. No wonder this thing is so half-baked. OddHerring (talk) 20:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Before making a widespread change to history templates, I suggest raising the idea at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject History. There was likely a reason they chose maps instead of crests. They may agree that crests are better, but that would be the place to get honest feedback and consensus on it. (Hohum @) 20:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)