User talk:OfficialSirFrost

This is OfficialSirFrost's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sir Frost (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:OfficialSirFrost/sandbox/Sir Frost and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:OfficialSirFrost/sandbox/Sir Frost, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering^(t) 01:33, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OfficialSirFrost! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering^(t) 01:33, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:OfficialSirFrost/sandbox/Sir Frost

A tag has been placed on User:OfficialSirFrost/sandbox/Sir Frost requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. creffett (talk) 01:40, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you. N.J.A. | talk 01:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

urgent

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OfficialSirFrost (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is an article of myself not a group band or website, please do not delete, please allow me also to make further edits OfficialSirFrost (talk) 10:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Why should we let you promote yourself here? MER-C 10:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OfficialSirFrost (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

new user name requested PLEASE UNBLOCK OfficialSirFrost (talk) 10:57 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

You have not addressed the concerns raised regarding promotional edits or otherwise properly confirmed the relationship to the name. See my previous comment before seeking further unblock requests. N.J.A. | talk 20:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

non promotion

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OfficialSirFrost (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is not for promotion but for an official article i would like to share i have the correct references, please allow me to edit? OfficialSirFrost (talk) 6:53 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ST47 (talk) 20:36, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Official? What makes it so? Why is this urgent? There is no deadline. Or is there? 11:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

The content was promotional. Wikipedia is not a venue for you to promote yourself. However, as you claim to be the person in question, I will ping @NJA: for there consideration of your unblock request. Meanwhile, please see WP:MUSIC, the notability guideline for musical subjects. Subjects related to music must meet this guideline or the WP:GNG to have articles in this encyclopedia. Dlohcierekim (talk) 11:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OfficialSirFrost as of now I would not unblock as you need to identify your relation to this entertainer. If you are this person I believe you may need to comply with the process at WP:REALNAME. Otherwise, and in terms of your references, looking at the deleted sandbox entry note that Facebook is insufficient (See reliable sources). You would need to convince an administrator that you will contribute to Wikipedia in a way other than being promotional, a conflict of interest or otherwise compensated for editing. It'd assist (once relationship to name is confirmed and any correct process is followed in that regard) for you to name subject areas or specific articles you may contribute to. N.J.A. | talk 13:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OfficialSirFrost (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

many thanks for understanding, unblock would be appreciated, ill check music guidelines now. cheers OfficialSirFrost (talk) 7:33 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ST47 (talk) 20:35, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Administrator note Awaiting user intervention pertaining to username relationship and if applicable completion of the required identification process (see diff under first unblock request). N.J.A. | talk 13:49, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OfficialSirFrost (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Jahmai Sir Frost Purcell (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

please unblock me so i can create the correct article OfficialSirFrost (talk) 10:37 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

See above before raising a new request as your review is already on hold. Further new requests without addressing the issues noted on this page will result in loss of talk page access as it is using up administrator time unnecessarily. N.J.A. | talk 20:28, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]