User talk:Ofi4012

This is Ofi4012's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:John Foxe (neuroscientist) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Foxe (neuroscientist). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 14:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Foxe (neuroscientist) (September 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Foxe is notable , but the draft is not written like an encyclopedia article . Don't use one-sentence paragraphs like a press release.Don't keep referring to him by his name more than necessary, as do press releases--use "he" most of the time. Avoid adjectives of praise, like prominent, or jargon like "spearheaded: or :recruited by". Don't just refer to his number of publication and overall citations--list his 4 or 5 most cited papers and give their citation figures.

Try to write concisely, and don't highlight parts of his career subsidiary to his principal notability , don't include minor material: ed. in chief is notable , member of an ed board, not even worth mentioning. Don't just refer to his number of publication and overall citations--list his 4 or 5 most cited papers and give their citation figures.

Every scientist delivers lectures and speaks at conferences. It's not worth mentioning. Similarly about his videa interviews, and don't name-drop the people he interviewed.

Do talk a little more about his research, with references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Foxe (neuroscientist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Foxe (neuroscientist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 17:25, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Hello Ofi4012. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ofi4012. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ofi4012|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DGG ( talk ) 17:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When I was creating the article, I tried to make the declaration that the subject is my brother. I am not sure whether that has happened as I am new to Wikipedia. I have not been compensated for this article. All the other edits that you suggested are very helpful, and I am happy to make them.

Would it be possible to get an update on when I can make edits to this article? Thanks.

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Foxe (neuroscientist) (May 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read again what I wrote last time. I am not going to rewrite it for you, it is your responsibility to do it correctly. Remove minor material like "adjunct professor" or "consults" or "works with" Focus on the citation to the individual most cited papers and the editor-in -chief position. I can help make sure articles on notable scientists are added to WP but if you don't do your share , it is frustrating, and I rather work with those where people pay attention to the problems.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Foxe (neuroscientist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Foxe (neuroscientist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:23, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ofi4012! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 06:23, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Foxe (neuroscientist) has been accepted[edit]

John Foxe (neuroscientist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

― Qwerfjkl | 𝕋𝔸𝕃𝕂 (please use {{reply to|Qwerfjkl}} on reply) 21:12, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sophie Molholm has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sophie Molholm. Thanks! — The Most Comfortable Chair 05:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sophie Molholm has been accepted[edit]

Sophie Molholm, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 11:15, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Damian Foxe moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Damian Foxe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Damian Foxe[edit]

Hello, Ofi4012. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Damian Foxe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Damian Foxe[edit]

Hello, Ofi4012. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Damian Foxe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:44, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]