User talk:Okoli mirax

Speedy deletion nomination of Okoli miracle

Hello Okoli mirax,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Okoli miracle for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

GMG ^talk 15:29, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:SubsAFC submission/draftnew

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:SubsAFC submission/draftnew, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. LynxTufts (talk) 15:33, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okoli miracle

Hey Okoli mirax. The article in question was deleted because it did not credibly indicate why the subject might be significant enough to warrant an article. In general, Wikipedia judges "importance" based on coverage in reliable published sources, usually things like magazines, newspapers, and books. If the subject has yet to receive this type of coverage, then it is likely too soon for them to have their own article, and we will need to wait until they do. GMG ^talk 14:40, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]