User talk:Olaf9999

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Olaf9999, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Church of St. Albert (Albertville, Minnesota), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! John from Idegon (talk) 02:51, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Church of St. Albert (Albertville, Minnesota)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Church of St. Albert (Albertville, Minnesota), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. John from Idegon (talk) 02:51, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Church of St. Albert (Albertville, Minnesota) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Church of St. Albert (Albertville, Minnesota) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of St. Albert (Albertville, Minnesota) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 06:17, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, sincerely[edit]

Olaf, please do not be put off by the deletion notices. Relatively few parish churches have pages. To have a page, a church needs to have been written up in newspapers, or in books, which usually happens when there is a famous priest, or notable event associated with a parish, or if the building is historically or architecturally notable. I suspect that your 1906 building is, and suggest that you explore having it registered as a Minnesota state historic building.

What is usual is that large parishes, like this one, have brief descriptions on the town Wikipedia page, with a link to the parish website. If you go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of St. Albert (Albertville, Minnesota) you will see that I have suggested this as an alternative to deletion. You are welcome ot join the discussion on that page.

I do hope that all of this does not put you off. We would welcome you as a colleague here at Wikipedia. I am relatively new here myself, and know what it feel like to be blindsided with something like this. It happens to all new editors. It takes a while to learn the ropes. Stick around, I think you'll enjoy it, and we do need new editors.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:59, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

Hello, Olaf9999, I saw that you made a draft for a new article at User:Olaf9999/sandbox. Short term hosting of potentially valid articles and other reasonable content under development or in active use is usually acceptable. But in this case, you haven't edited your draft for a long time. If you wish to improve the draft yourself, please do. Otherwise, you may consider donating it to WikiProject Abandoned Drafts (a participant can help). Thank you. GretLomborg (talk) 18:45, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]