User talk:Oldnavy77

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Munn v. Illinois, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Munn v. Illinois was changed by Oldnavy77 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855341 on 2011-03-02T05:06:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Miranda v. Arizona. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. All removals of referenced material need to have an edit summary to explain the removal. Note that an edit summary alone will not prevent removed, referenced material from being reinserted into the text. Ravendrop 05:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Abington School District v. Schempp, you may be blocked from editing. Ravendrop 05:13, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stone v. Graham, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ravendrop 05:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]