User talk:Oliver at Commerzbank

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Oliver_at_Commerzbank.

Welcome!

Hello, Oliver at Commerzbank, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 19:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello. I see that you have already disclosed your affiliation, thanks for that. Since you have edited an article that is covered by the conflict of interest, I am posting this standard message. Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 03:22, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oliver at Commerzbank. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. —Paleo Neonate – 03:22, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Here you misrepresented this edit as follows: As some of the biographical details were wrong or at least misleading, I did a quick update.

In that edit you actually:

added an infobox (has nothing to do with "wrong or misleading")
added the state where he was born (has nothing to do with "wrong or misleading")
reorganized content (has nothing to do with "wrong or misleading")
Many many other changes that had nothing to do with "wrong or misleading"

If I find you or colleagues directly editing content about your employer again, I will see that you (and they) are indefinitely blocked. The direct editing is bad enough, even though you apparently are aware of request edit and other best practices. The best practice is for you to not directly edit.

The misrepresentation of what you did is an entirely different matter and is unacceptable.

By the way, please take this seriously. See User talk:Florian Schaub at Merck KGaA English Wikipedia is much more strict about direct editing by corporate representatives than German WP is.

Usually I would offer to explain what you should do, but since you said you are already aware of best practices, I am not sure what there is to talk about... I will offer you User:Jytdog/How to read, in any case. Jytdog (talk) 13:50, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Zielke (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Martin Zielke, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Oliver at Commerzbank/Martin Zielke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Oliver at Commerzbank/Martin Zielke, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering^(t) 13:11, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oliver at Commerzbank! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering^(t) 13:11, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stefan Schmittmann (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Stefan Schmittmann, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Oliver at Commerzbank/Stefan Schmittmann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Oliver at Commerzbank/Stefan Schmittmann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering^(t) 13:12, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stefan Schmittmann has been accepted

Stefan Schmittmann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 07:27, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]