User talk:Onepebble

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Onepebble! Thank you for your contributions. I am Dthomsen8 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! DThomsen8 (talk) 22:54, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

May 6, 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wales. Your edits may appear to constitute vandalism. They have been reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

Thank you. -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 09:46, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Onepebble. I'm sorry if the previous message that Gareth left you was a little confusing. Don't worry - we don't think you're trying to mess anything up, it's just that part of your edit, where you moved some images, apparently caused some formatting issues where there was too much blank space in some areas. If you're curious about the specifics, check with FruitMonkey, the user who undid your change, I just wanted to follow up because I understand those template messages can be off-putting and wanted to reassure you that your work is not considered vandalism and is appreciated. ST47 (talk) 17:31, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

• Hello Onepebble, Just a line to thank you for the incredible amount of good editing since you began on May 1. With regard to my note above, what I meant to write was, " ... at Wales. Your edits here may, to others, appear to constitute ... They have been reverted by another editor." Kind regards, -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 23:41, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

That's alright Griff-J.

I's be knowing Wales is your hood and all that, so dem fingers be ON the trigger!

Onepebble (talk) 10:57, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Good man! We'll keep in touch. -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 12:16, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Change for the sake of change

Please refrain from changing multiple articles by merely adding paragraph breaks, particularly where the breaks are inappropriate and make the article choppy. Change for the sake of change is not constructive editing. Oldtaxguy (talk) 22:11, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Talk:European_sovereign-debt_crisis#Source_236:_Altered.2F_manipulated_figure

See Talk:European_sovereign-debt_crisis#Source_236:_Altered.2F_manipulated_figure User:Fred Bauder Talk 03:25, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks for showing me Onepebble (talk) 03:27, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Making many changes in single edit

Hello Onepebble, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you wasn't offended by my revert at the Six-Day War article. Making smaller changes as you did here and here makes it soo much easier to spot any mistakes (and we all make mistakes, of course). Well done! --Frederico1234 (talk) 10:02, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Have this beer on me!

Well done ... your editing is coming on really well. Keep up the good work on The Six-Day War. Cheers! -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 10:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks G, I was just having a quiet drink too you should come over - yep, that page done come up! Onepebble (talk) 13:10, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Hey! That looks like some party ol' Nelly's having over there ... think, p'haps, I shall join you. -- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 15:16, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Having reviewed the edits, I agree that those were good edits. I particularly like the added sub-section headers in the West Bank section, as that section probably leaves most readers gasping for air. --Frederico1234 (talk) 21:08, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

True Frederico - simple changes to make a complex page more digestible for the reader. Onepebble (talk) 00:01, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

References

Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. Thanks and welcome to Wikipedia.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:30, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Have moved this here until proper refs are found.

The use of the immunosuppressive medication Azathioprine (Imuran) has been linked to increased rates of developing skin cancer.

Azathioprine is used to prevent rejection following organ transplantation, and to treatautoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, pemphigus, inflammatory bowel disease (such asCrohn's disease and ulcerative colitis), multiple sclerosis, autoimmune hepatitis, atopic dermatitis,myasthenia gravis, neuromyelitis optica or Devic's disease, restrictive lung disease, and others.

Skin cancer is 50 to 250 times more common among transplant patients than the general population - 20 years after a transplant between 60% and 90% of patients are affected.

Azathioprine causes the accumulation of 6-thioguanine (6-TG) in patients' DNA. This can trigger cancer when the patient is later exposed to ultraviolet light. Patients taking azathioprine were found to be abnormally sensitive to UVA light.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:30, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

That sounds fine. BUT, this one time, when the popo hit me wit like 14 rounds, hollow point, and just a bottle of tussin (regular) done cure - peer review didn't be predicting that, nomesayin? Onepebble (talk) 15:21, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)