User talk:OxBeatergod7712

March 2021

Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Tiwa Savage, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Binksternet (talk) 08:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PeterFeargod, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi PeterFeargod! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Naira Marley. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 13:35, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Abubakar Malami, you may be blocked from editing. Notfrompedro (talk) 13:57, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did not add adversiting material as you can. I find it ethical enough that when most content are added or updated and they have a source for that information/content, that source should be referred to. Also, I can see a lot of publications that have added content to Wikipedia, even on those pages I edited and fresh content, who actually added a link back to their respective webpages. How do you classify that as non-promotional and classify this as promotional? PeterFeargod (talk) 14:01, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are adding your own blog as a reference for gossip content you add. This is WP:REFSPAM. The fact that other publications are used as references doesn't make it spam as they weren't added by the content creators and they are likely reliable source whereas your blog is not. The relevant guideline can be seen at WP:UGC. Notfrompedro (talk) 14:07, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]