User talk:Oxbowa

Orzo

I have protected the page for 24 hours. Please utilize WP:DR. More edit warring will result in being blocked. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 14:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reaching an agreement

You removed the alternative name in the text, but according to Wikimedia Commons (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Orzo) "risoni" is the most common name after "orzo", so it would be correct to add it; Done. Now let's think about the rest. JacktheBrown (talk) 17:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm waiting for your feedback, thank you. JacktheBrown (talk) 14:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please

I would like an answer, I won't abandon my objectives. We have to solve the problem; in case of no response I will ask for an external opinion, and if this person will agree with me this will not be in your favour. I suggest you reply to me. JacktheBrown (talk) 22:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why remove all countries except italy? Oxbowa (talk) 14:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Xiaomichel per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xiaomichel. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 19:26, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I blocked ? jackthebrown was removing content Oxbowa (talk) 12:36, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oxbowa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I blocked? I just restored content that jackthebrown was removing for no reason Oxbowa (talk) 14:37, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating WP:SOCK, as a suspected sockpuppet account of Xiaomichel. You need to directly address this in any unblock request. Yamla (talk) 16:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oxbowa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yamla Thank you! I am not the sockpuppet, it's wrong. What can I do to solve this? Oxbowa (talk) 11:34, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You'll need to do more than just deny it, you'll need to give a plausible explanation as to why your edits and technical information would indicate you are a sock if you are not. 331dot (talk) 12:30, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot What is my technical information please? and what about my edits? if you mean the edit war with Jackbrown I already explained that I was restoring information deleted by him.