User talk:P.sasidharreddy

Welcome!

Hello, P.sasidharreddy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Your recent edits

Please review Wikipedia:Style with regards to the linguistic standards of Wikipedia. Michaelbusch 04:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Hamam on ocation of vinayaka chavithi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hamam on ocation of vinayaka chavithi.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Little context in Nennur(Ramachandrapuram(MD))

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nennur(Ramachandrapuram(MD)), by Tao of tyler (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nennur(Ramachandrapuram(MD)) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nennur(Ramachandrapuram(MD)), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 08:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

గాజులమండ్యం

You may have intended to submit this article to another language Wikipedia (maybe the Telugu Wikipedia?) rather than the English Wikipedia. --Metropolitan90 05:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nennur(Ramachandrapuram(MD))

A tag has been placed on Nennur(Ramachandrapuram(MD)), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Lou.weird 09:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Gajulamandyam Ammavaru.JPG

A tag has been placed on Gajulamandyam Ammavaru.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:47, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Gajulamandyam, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 17:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, P.sasidharreddy. You have new messages at Vin09's talk page.
Message added 05:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Vin09 (talk) 05:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Gajulamandyam. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 05:36, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]