User talk:PFConroy

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cognitive Bias Mitigation.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:35, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This entry 'superceded'

The entry "Cognitive Bias Mitigation" was superceded by the entry "Cognitive bias mitigation" (caps only change). Thanks, Chiswick Chap... PFConroy (talk) 04:18, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Need for References in Cognitive Bias Mitigation

What does 'unreferenced section' mean - that there aren't any citations? what about references to other Wikipedia pages? don't they count? (PF Conroy)

Hallo, and welcome to Wikipedia. Yes, it means there are no citations there. Links to other WP articles are not citations, certainly not reliable ones, as WP can be edited by anyone so you can't assume WP is accurate nor use it as a known source. Since we're here, let me add that as an article, Cognitive Bias Mitigation is currently too long, too discursive and very probably too academic for a general WP readership. I accepted it at AfC because it did have sources, but it needs substantial tidying to make it more accessible. The tone (go back and read the paragraph about 'flying a glider') is also distinctly unencyclopedic in places - we are aiming for a quiet, neutral, factual tone, and while everyone appreciates some humour or gentle irony, it isn't really appropriate in a global encyclopedia. But I didn't want to slap too many tags on all at once, and there's time enough (and I hope editors enough) to tidy up useful articles. Well done. with best wishes Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many changes made to Cognitive bias mitigation

Not sure how to request another look at this entry. If Chiswick Chap is listening: many thanks for your suggestions and the tone with which you make them. Another quick sweep would be very much appreciated! PFConroy (talk) 04:16, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've had another look, and I must admit I am quite concerned that the article may be outside Wikipedia's scope. Firstly (and it is hard for a non-specialist to be certain of this), it appears that the article relies heavily on primary (research) sources, as opposed to reliable secondary sources. This matters, because (secondly), it appears that the article then argues a case (or two) using personal knowledge rather than relying on secondary sources. This is called "Original Research" (WP:OR) - indeed, building a case by assembling primary sources is called "OR by synthesis" and is specifically excluded.

It would therefore be deeply reassuring to learn that the article relies for all its arguments on specific secondary sources, which themselves integrate primary research. If there are sections of the article where this is not true (and cannot be made so) they should be removed.

Worrying signs include lists of sources at a single place in the article, implying synthesis, and subsections with no sources, implying original research. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cognitive Bias Mitigation concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cognitive Bias Mitigation, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:03, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Cognitive Bias Mitigation

Hello PFConroy. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Cognitive Bias Mitigation.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cognitive Bias Mitigation}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 05:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]