Jump to content

User talk:PJCCI

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. EROS message 15:14, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello, PJCCI! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 15:14, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your submission and paid editing

[edit]

Greetings. I've read your reply on my talk page and would want to discuss a few things with you. First, the reason of your declination. Although you are using your own company's website as a source, Wikipedia doesn't allow an article to over rely on one particular website. That would be counted as copyright violation, even if it's your own homepage. That is also the reason why your submission is being deleted. Another thing about sourcing would be primary sourcing. Primary sources are considered to be unreliable on Wikipedia. Examples of primary sources would be a company's homepage and/or closely affiliated websites. Instead, you should go for reliable sources and they would be from mainstream publication, books, magazines, weeklies and newspapers. The second thing is about paid editing. You are writing on behalf of your company and you will have to declare and disclose that. For more information and procedures, visit: Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Cheers. EROS message 09:00, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Melocheville Tunnel has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Melocheville Tunnel. Thanks! KJP1 (talk) 14:07, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melocheville Tunnel has been accepted

[edit]
Melocheville Tunnel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KJP1 (talk) 14:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]