User talk:Pak Lodin

December 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Tafeax (talk) 06:41, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to 1MDB Airlines. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:44, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter if the airline is real or not. You have not established its notability. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:53, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Pak_Lodin reported by User:JJMC89 (Result: ). Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 07:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 1MDB Airlines, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 07:04, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 1MDB Airlines. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Stop removing the CSD tag. Have fun getting blocked. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 07:07, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Charles de Gaulle Airport shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 07:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Charles de Gaulle Airport, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 07:14, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pak Lodin: Holy crap dude, stop your edit warring. Wish I could block you, geez. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 07:16, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:18, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]