User talk:Pakenham4

Welcome!

Hello, Pakenham4, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! NickelShoe (Talk) 13:44, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Petrie0.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Petrie0.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 12:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Petrie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Petrie.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes on Queensland towns/suburbs

Hi,

Just thought I'd say "thanks" for adding a lot of infoboxes lately. To be honest, I'm cleaning up my watchlist and removing many of the pages that show up due to your edits, but thought I should let you know that people do appreciate your contribution. --Scott Davis ^Talk 07:22, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to second this, as I had started what adding many info boxes but did not have time to complete it. Great to see it finally being done. Rimmeraj 11:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Distance From CBD

Hi, It appears you are changing the distance to the CBD on the suburb articles, but it does not match the distance quoted in the reference page on ourbrisbane. If you are using another reference can you add it to the page so we can see where your new distances are coming from? thanks Rimmeraj 11:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it might be wise to add this as a reference at some stage, as the casual reader may wonder why the wikipedia distances differ from ourbrisbane.com, and some will revert your changes thinking them incorrect. Thanks again. Rimmeraj 12:31, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also I reverted my change to Wynnum West based on on your information about your source. Rimmeraj 12:38, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Minden, Queensland

A tag has been placed on Minden, Queensland, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G12.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Mattinbgn\^talk 22:42, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Glamorgan Vale, Queensland

A tag has been placed on Glamorgan Vale, Queensland, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G12.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Mattinbgn\^talk 22:42, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio removed

I removed the copyvio from the above two articles, and declined the speedy. For Minden, i rewrote a little of it on the basis of the source. Even if the result is only an infobox, do not add copyvio from the web page for the region, which is not PD, but carries a copyright notice. Please immediately check your other articles & edit as needed. . DGG (talk) 23:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]