User talk:Pappubahry

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Pappubahry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -Andrew c 01:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Pappubahry! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 971 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Matthew Burke (rugby player born 1964) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:36, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wilson & McClelland[edit]

Hi there. I reverted the edit you made on Candidates of the Australian federal election, 1940 regarding Wimmera - mainly as an interim measure, because if definitely correct there will need to be some more widespread changes. What source are you using? I have read conflicting sources on this one, and certainly as far as I know Wilson never behaved as a member of the parliamentary Country Party (and the UCP was the one that supported the pledge of loyalty!). The ADB entry is generally confusing on this issue, and there is certainly some support in Trove for the change; however, the implication seems to be in some of it that the UCP is the anti-loyalty group, which we have a fair bit of evidence for being not true. However, the Wimmera is nothing if not strange politically, and if you have more information on this particular contest I would be delighted to hear about it! Frickeg (talk) 13:24, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think I may raise this at WT:AUP, because a bit more wandering through Trove suggests to me that we are treating Wilson incorrectly for almost the entirety of his career! Please comment there. Frickeg (talk) 13:26, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: above, obviously I'm wrong about the UCP being pro-loyalty. It's late! As you'll see at AUP, I'm inclined to think you're quite right, but we need to figure out a way to deal with the very complicated state of the Victorian CP at the time and it would be best to do it all at once (clearly, for example, even if we decide to treat Wilson as a UCP candidate - and I think we probably will - he can hardly go in the Coalition column as he was explicitly anti-Coalition). Frickeg (talk) 14:23, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great work[edit]

I just want to say your ongoing efforts and diligence with party affiliations and such like are a huge boon to this project, and I hope you stick around once you finish this particular job. The Australian politics project could really use you! Frickeg (talk) 01:09, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For 1901, definitely check the Hawker book (details listed in the references of the 1901 candidates page) - I couldn't believe it when I found it at the university library; it was practically made for this kind of work. Do send me the link when you get your dataset online as it sounds terrifically interesting. I have a candidate database for federal and state elections in a monstrous word document at the moment and would love to get it online one day ... when I figure out the best way to set it out! Frickeg (talk) 04:01, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks terrific! Thanks for letting me know! Frickeg (talk) 08:14, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please have a look at the convo here and here? I love your Aus fed electorates resource, however where I live, metro Adelaide, the boundaries don't align with the roads. Look at the top and bottom boundary lines of Adelaide for example. The lines seem to be diagonal to roads/real boundaries. Where did you source the boundary co-ordinates from? Are you able to rectify the issue? Thanks. Timeshift (talk) 05:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]