User talk:Parsons.eu
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Parsons.eu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Gurt Posh (talk) 13:19, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aevol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aevol until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 02:01, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Aevol
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Aevol, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.aevol.fr/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Aevol and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Aevol, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Aevol with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Aevol. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Aevol saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:39, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- In addition to this form letter, I just wanted to note that this issue is distinct from the issue of whether or not the article should be retained. We simply need to verify compatible license in order to retain this portion of it. If you have any questions about the verification process, please feel free to visit my talk page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:39, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but there seems to have been some sort of snafu. While I was in the process of confirming the release, it seems to have disappeared. I have blanked the content again. If you have removed the release, will you please put it back? I cannot verify the release if it is removed before I am able to complete the documentation. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, it may still be there - there is VERY small print at the bottom of the page. You don't have to keep it permanently, but I do need a legible release at least until I have captured an archive of it. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:12, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you! If you could, please, leave it for a week or so at that size, that would be very helpful. I've linked to the current release, but I'm afraid that the archive is still illegible and likely to remain so until the WebCite cache clears. I've made a note to myself to check back next Monday. Once we get this in the record, you can remove the release or make it as small as is convenient for you. I appreciate your working with us to get this question resolved. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:54, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, it may still be there - there is VERY small print at the bottom of the page. You don't have to keep it permanently, but I do need a legible release at least until I have captured an archive of it. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:12, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but there seems to have been some sort of snafu. While I was in the process of confirming the release, it seems to have disappeared. I have blanked the content again. If you have removed the release, will you please put it back? I cannot verify the release if it is removed before I am able to complete the documentation. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC)