User talk:PastoftheFuture

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Kelly Rowland's third album. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 01:55, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Nicki Minaj discography worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. When you don't like a certain edit within other ones, please do not by lazy and revert the entire edit, especially when there are helpful edits. Thanks. Yves (talk) 01:21, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Passion, Pain & Pleasure. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 23:04, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Common knowledge" refers to something that "everybody knows" (Wikipedia:Common knowledge). Either cite a reliable source or do not readd your content. Also, do not encourage looking at other Wikipedia articles as source, as that amounts to self-reference, and is not reliable, nor encyclopedic (WP:Verifiability). Dan56 (talk) 23:45, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fading

Per WP:NSONGS whilst charting helps establish notability.... there has to be enough information for a detailed page. In this case there is not. Plus the chart position given (187) is not sourced, even if it was it certainly does not warrant an independent article. Equally, being contender for a single does not make something notable. Read WP:NSONGS very carefully. Additionally just because other stuff exists, that doesn't meaning "Fading" should exist. It would be appreciated if you quit edit warring. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 00:52, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nicole Scherzinger discography, you may be blocked from editing. Mister sparky (talk) 22:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]