User talk:Paul Medland

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Mutt Lunker 22:40, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Mutt Lunker 09:15, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome again

Hi, Paul, Sorry if it seems that you are being harshly treated here. Kindly come over to Talk:Fingerboard and show me (and the rest of the eyes on that page) that somebody, somewhere, is using your defragmented arrangement to good musical advantage. An article in a magazine, written by some third party without an interest in the endeavour, would be just the ticket. Need something to point to that says, "this thing has been getting noticed."

Best, __Just plain Bill 11:53, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of reply on my talk page

Paul, you are preaching to the choir about the QWERTY keyboard here. I typed Dvorak layout for many years, but it became enough of a pain to re-map the keyboard of any machine I happened to be at, that I now go along with the lamentable QWERTY, because it's what we've got.

I don't have any problem wih the brilliance of your idea, as far as dealing with the silly B string and what it does to patterns shifted crosswise, or fretwise. I mostly play strings tuned in fifths, so I can only imagine what it's like to not be able to move a pattern over. Power to you in that regard.

Where we have a problem, is that you've put up info about your own invention, which is original research, and doesn't belong in the wikipedia. When your fret system becomes more wide-spread, then it will have a place here. It won't take a Clapton to put it here, but there ought to be more people playing it than one virtuoso inventor, or at least one virtuoso with some media attention beyond your own site and a YouTube video. Best regards, __Just plain Bill 01:13, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

It should be self-evident but petty vandalism of my user page doesn't actually add to your case. Mutt Lunker 13:37, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to John Howard. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shot info 00:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Peter Costello, you will be blocked from editing. Shot info 00:04, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Johnsreward.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Johnsreward.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Johnsreward.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Johnsreward.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Dsc00641 490 370.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Dsc00641 490 370.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Dsc00641 490 370.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Dsc00641 490 370.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]