User talk:Paul tk

Welcome!

Hello, Paul tk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 2013 Southwestern United States heat wave, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ...William 13:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2013 Southwestern United States heat wave

The article 2013 Southwestern United States heat wave has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. WP:NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 13:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Desertec, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandstorm. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Faya-Largeau

Hi Paul, I've reverted your edits at Faya-Largeau because you replaced referenced text with your own unreferenced, opinionated thoughts about the climate (for example your use of the words "extreme" and "probably"). I've noticed you've made other similar edits to Wikipedia articles. In general, Wikipedia tries to follow a neutral point of view (which means that articles should not contain opinions), and all statements on the site should be referenced to reliable sources (see Help:Referencing for beginners for information about how to do that. I know that meteorology and eather records are exciting, but in Wikipedia we care more about the facts than people's opinions about them. Graham87 15:13, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me what's happened when you've tried to add references? I can help you out with that. I believe what you're saying, but Wikipedia strongly relies so much on sources. Graham87 03:43, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pages are generally placed on the spam blacklist for very good reasons. Show me the Borkou reference and I'll check it out. Graham87 07:51, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link. I can't read the text, because as it says on my user page, I'm blind; I also don't know any French. However my main concern with that source is its age; as you probably know, quality control has become more strict since then, and the data in that source may include erroneous temperature records (more of a concern for extremes than averages). If you wanted to cite it you could use the {{cite journal}} template and write something like {{cite journal|title= Le Borkou. Aspects d'un modèle éolien|journal= Annales de Géographie|year=1968|first=Monique|last=Mainguet|volume=77|issue=421|pages=296–322|url=http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/geo_0003-4010_1968_num_77_421_15662}}. For the blacklisted link, enclose it in nowiki tags like <nowiki>this</nowiki> and I'll check it out. Graham87 09:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just put the blacklisted link on my talk page, surrounded by nowiki tags, and I'll figure out what I can do about it. I agree that that article that mentions Faya-Largeau can be used as a source, but not the *sole* source for the data. Graham87 11:00, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you remove the Google part of the URL, you get this link: http://people.sca.uqam.ca/~presyn/NotesdeCoursS2611/S2611Sujet6A_01c.3.pdf, which works fine. You can use the {{cite web}} template to fill out that citation to provide a title, authorship info, etc. That file appears to be a set of professor's notes for a university course; it's probably fine as a reference, but a journal article or book would be better, if possible. One thing I forgot to note in my message above is that when a reference is not in English, you should indicate what language it's in. When using {{cite journal}}, {{cite web}}, or {{cite book}}, you do this by adding "|language=French" to the end of the citation. Another thing about your edit to the Faya-Largeau article: Wikipedia uses a template, {{convert}}, for measurement conversions including temperatures. For example, the code {{convert|40|°C}} (without the nowiki tags) produces 40 °C (104 °F). Graham87 12:49, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of deserts may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Deliblatska Peščara]] – a desert located in [[Vojvodina]], [[Serbia]] (300 km²]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:52, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Port Sudan

Your edits at Port Sudan has been reverted for a couple of reasons. First of all, your edits, similar to the issue with Faya-Largeau that Graham87 has brought one do not adhere to the neutral point of view. You replaced neutral text with highly biased statements such as "with a long, torrid summer" and "very sunny weather". More importantly, you're removing so much crucial information such as sunshine. Why? NOAA is a reliable source unless you have a problem with using it as a source. Normally, English sources are preferred to other languages if both of them provide the same useful info so the NOAA source should be used rather than a French source as some readers may not understand it. If you keep removing data like this in other city articles and replacing neutral statements with biased one, you may be blocked for disruptive editing. Ssbbplayer (talk) 14:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Solar power in Africa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 8th parallel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Solar power in Africa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 9th parallel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Paul tk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Paul tk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2013 Southwestern United States heat wave for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013 Southwestern United States heat wave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Southwestern United States heat wave until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG ^talk 08:41, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Thanks for contributing to the article 2013 Southwestern United States heat wave. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). Thanks! P.S. If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]