User talk:Pentasyllabic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Heroes[edit]

Thanks for catching the duplicate "Trivia" header... there's enough fuss over even one section, so I imaging I might have been banned from the Internet for introducing *two* in one article... (grin) Cheers. --Ckatzchatspy 23:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey... you might want to read through this note I left on the Heroes project page. Cheers. --Ckatzchatspy 06:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Midnighter[edit]

I re-added the cn tags because the article need the info cited. Just because I may not disagree with the accuracy of the info doesn't mean that others will adopt the same viewpoint, and it is my goal to FA-proof every article I come across. Midnighter is pretty good thus far, but it is bloated to the point of morbid obesity. It needs trimming, and if people know where info needs to be tagged, then that's a great place to start the trim. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 06:33, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Naruto geography, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naruto geography (2nd nomination).

Another editor started it 2 November and I just noticed that the contributors still needed to be notified. --A. B. (talk) 19:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Batman is rich, Batman is smart[edit]

You made an interesting point about the Forbes thing. I had to think about that. I would argue though, that (1) wealth can be measured more objectively than intelligence and (2), more importantly, Forbes is in the business of measuring wealth but Business Week is not does not normally measure intelligence. I would sooner argue to remove the Forbes/wealth sentence than use is to support mentioning the Business Week/intelligence list. Doczilla (talk) 00:27, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manga images discussion[edit]

Please offer your input in a current debate on the use of manga covers in articles at Talk:List of Hunter × Hunter chapters#Use of Images. Thank you! Shimawa zen (talk) 01:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I was thinking about discussion. This discussion was about whether it was "Owari no Tani" or "Shumatsu no Tani", but I got them confused. I forgot what they were talking about, and was too lazy to check the archives, and I thought they were discussing whether the "Tani" part was actually "Mori", and thought that Kishimoto put a furigana indicating it being "Mori" instead of "Tani". In short, you were correct, and I got it confused. moocows rule 03:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Blue Sun[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Blue Sun, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Sun. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Robofish (talk) 02:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]