User talk:Peter m 2001
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Peter m 2001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for United Kingdom national debt. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting Started
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Asteuartw (talk) 10:48, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
November 2013
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to United Kingdom national debt may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- more and saving less. (Private Sector Surplus = Government Deficit – External Deficit)<ref>[http://heteconomist.com/what-everyone-should-know-about-budget-deficits-and-public-debt/ What
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:59, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
[edit]![]() |
Hi Peter m 2001! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
United Kingdom National Debt
[edit]Peter m 2001, at the very least you need to explain your edits. Every time you make an edit, you should say what it is you are doing and why. Many of your recent edits do not belong on the page, rather they should be added here: History of the British national debt. ----Asteuartw (talk) 11:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
The comments are pertinent to the ND as it is - not as it was historically. The edits are referenced are should be self explanatory. Which one would you say needs the most additional explanation? I'm happy to discuss further. Peter m 2001 (talk) 11:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC)