User talk:Pieces123

this is a contrib page. Y'all contrib my page for murders, abnormal psychotics, strange erectile dysfunctions, etc.

Speedy deletion nomination of Brett glasby

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andy (talk) 23:01, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Barry George. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. andy (talk) 23:02, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how making a satement about identifiable violators of females, whom have clear links with the murder scene, who are sprayed with the same bullets used on a murder suspect is somehow unbalancing their being called a potential murder suspect. I suggest you take evidence into account before trying to inaccurately skew my wikipedia edits. If you do so again, I will report you to the wikipedia staff forthwith. Cease and desist from marring strong ntellectual judgements on a post which has been backed up by evidence.--Pieces123 (talk) 23:05, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brett glasby

A tag has been placed on Brett glasby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Technopat (talk) 00:01, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Brett glasby. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. — Jeff G. ツ 00:15, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Brett glasby. — Jeff G. ツ 00:17, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will not be warned for removing speed deletion links when I've maintained that a) Brett Glasby is a suspect in the ONS murders. b) The ONS murders were atrocious to those with memories of them c) Therefore he is infamous enough to deserve a page. My page is NOT vandalism, and as ive maintained, a p-a-g-e w-h-i-c-h s-h-o-w-s a c-r-i-m-i-n-a-l o-f s-e-rious standing (talks slowly) is necessary to be shown on the page. It is 1) of value and 2) to do with a famous case. I cannot make myself more voiciferous about why this page should stay.

Wikipedia is not a place to post rumor or innuendo. All material on individuals, living or dead, must be sourced. Information alleging criminal activity must be from multiple, ironclad sources. YouTube, blogs and the like are not suitable sources. Major newspapers, books, and the like are. Get good sources, and there's a chance of the article's survival. Simply stating that you know it's important isn't enough. Acroterion _(talk) 00:42, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And don't remove speedy deletion tags from articles you've posted yourself. You may contest them, but not remove them. Acroterion _(talk) 00:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To expand somewhat on the reasons why your article is not well-received: please review Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons. I realize the person you're writing about is supposed to have died in 1982, but you supply no reliable source (see WP:RS) to substantiate that, and the BLP policy still applies where it might impact living relatives - see WP:BLP#Deceased. Wikipedia isn't a publisher or forum for original research. All material must be substantiated by reference to satisfactory published sources, and for allegations of criminal activity this applies to the greatest extent. Additionally, the notability of a criminal suspect is questionable, particularly when coupled with speculation, and may be subject to speedy deletion or a full deletion debate on those grounds alone. Acroterion _(talk) 02:43, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brett glasby

A tag has been placed on Brett glasby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --moreno oso (talk) 17:11, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]