User talk:Piper's wives

Nomination of Gujarat International Finance Tec-City for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gujarat International Finance Tec-City is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gujarat International Finance Tec-City until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anon1-3483579 (talk) 02:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Tony Briffa, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Meters (talk) 19:40, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bozeman, Montana. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Stop using the edit summaries as a forum. Meters (talk) 19:45, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Tony Briffa .

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 19:46, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tony Briffa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Stop using the edit summaries as a forum. Trankuility (talk) 19:52, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Meters. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Stay off my talk page. I don't want to know about your medical issues and I don't appreciate you accusing me of being part of a conspiracy. And stop marking all your edits as minor. Meters (talk) 06:48, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:01, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]