User talk:Pollasumera

Welcome

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia.

From your edits - it looks as if you might need to be up on (or maybe not) one or other of the following:-

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Satu Suro 11:05, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mate

You overlink in your arts - one link for a name in an article for each topic - not 6, and you should not put so many external links inside articles- they are not a fit with WP:MOS - issues with WP:COI (read it) might arise and also it would be well worth finding something other than imbd for refs otherwise there are issues with WP:RS in what you have dabbled in so far - WP:NOT is well worth as essential reading if someone challenges your material - Satu Suro 11:46, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not even try

To create a category related to your film viz http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Convicts_on_the_West_Coast_of_Tasmania&diff=225364445&oldid=225364431.

To not get material deleted or challenged - you should be thinking totally different direction - how to reduce the sign of your trying to grab attention on wikipedia - to yourself, your namesakes and your film - not finding every way to make it look like you are using wikipedia as an advertising medium. cheers Satu Suro 23:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Overlinking or you will get a warning that can lead to a block if you ignore the advice given initally in WP:AGF - cheers Satu Suro 09:23, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know if you really understand yet - this is an online encyclopedia - not a blog site - in its original format i know of some eds who would put it up the article for speedy delete as blatant advertising and it would have gone quick I suspect - consider your good fortunes and try to stop fiddling with it Satu Suro 09:30, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Satu Suro 09:25, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Sadly still a case of overlinking both - the film article and the one about pearce. Trust the ABC showing goes ok - hope you find some opportunity to edit in wikipedia on something else - hope you have learnt something - it would be very good to get an idea of what wikiepedia is about - rather than a platform to promote your film :) - cheers Satu Suro 14:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Nial Fulton 2007.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Nial Fulton 2007.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NW (Talk) 19:47, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

After 3 years of warnings above - Please stop overlinking at Alexander Pearce - see WP:OVERLINKING - the article looks like an advertisement anyway- your tinkling suggest your editing is WP:SPA and you may well over time find yourself with issues other editors might observe and respond to Satu Suro 10:39, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:LCOAP Cover.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:LCOAP Cover.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:09, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Borderland (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Borderland.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 05:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Borderland (AJAM) was accepted

Borderland (AJAM), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SAMI ^talk 14:49, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Borderland (AJAM) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Borderland (AJAM) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borderland (AJAM) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 10:53, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hitting Home

Every week, at least one women in Australia dies at the hands of a violent partner or ex-partner. In this unflinching two part series, acclaimed ABC journalist Sarah Ferguson immerses herself in a women's refuge to shine a light on the otherwise hidden world of domestic violence in Australia.

Hitting Home was produced by In Films for ABC Television in association with Screen NSW. The series was broadcast on 24th / 25th November 2015 in conjunction with UN International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women. Following the broadcast of Episode 2, a special domestic violence edition of Q&A was hosted by Julia Baird.

CRITICAL ACCLAIM

'Eye opening and devastating investigation. Ferguson and her team have produced a confronting series that should shake everyone into action.' – The Age

‘Hitting Home is unmissable…it is ground breaking….Compelling and important television. Ferguson and her team have done extraordinary work.’ - Peter Fitzsimons, Sydney Morning Herald

‘Hitting Home is simply exceptional. A landmark in TV history, not just for this year…’ – Neil McMahon, Sydney Morning Herald

‘Brilliant work by Sarah Ferguson. Hitting Home is compulsive viewing for all.’

– Adele Ferguson, ABC

‘My heart is in my throat. Thank you Sarah Ferguson and all those brave women who spoke out.’ – Georgina Dent, Mamamia

‘All power to Hitting Home for showing the faces of abusers. Powerful women, powerful journalism.’ – Joe Hildebrand

‘Every Australian should watch this right now.’ – Tracey Spicer

‘If you haven’t watched Hitting Home, you need to. Powerful and important television.’ – David Sharaz, SBS

‘I’m calling it. Hitting Home is the most important piece of TV you will see this year. For yourself and our community, watch it.’

– Chip Rolley, The Drum

RATINGS

Episode 1 Episode 2

AWARDS AND NOMINATIONS

Nominated: AACTA Best Documentary Television Programme 2016 AACTA Best Editing in a Documentary 2016

Nominated: Walkley Documentary Award 2016

Nominated: Amnesty International Award 2016

Winner: Our Watch Awards 2016 (Best Longform)

Nominated: Screen Producers Australia 2016 (Best Documentary Series)

Nominated: Logie 2016 (Most Outstanding Public Affair Report)

Nominated: Kennedy Awards 2016 (Outstanding Television Current Affairs Reporting) (Outstanding Investigative Reporting)

CRAFT AWARDS:

Winner: ADG Awards 2016 - Ivan O'Mahoney (Best Direction in a Documentary Series)

Nominated: Screen Editors Guild Awards - Andrew Cooke (Best Editing in a Documentary)