User talk:PopeyetheSailorMan90

April 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. clpo13_(talk) 23:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rob Paulsen. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 23:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the linked articles above. Reverting and yelling is only going to get you blocked. clpo13_(talk) 23:18, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wally Wingert. You must discuss your concerns and gain consensus for them. That is how Wikipedia works. 331dot (talk) 23:20, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SMALL JIM 23:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. If necessary, your ability to edit this page can be removed. 331dot (talk) 00:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will stop saying stuff if you guy's kindly tell MarnetteD to stop giving out my personal information please. PopeyetheSailorMan90 (talk) 14:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you are being wronged, two wrongs do not make a right. There are proper procedures to go through if you are being wronged in some way. You will need to make a properly formatted unblock request to be able to attempt to do so. 331dot (talk) 14:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what I meant, he keep giving out were I live and stuff. Tell him to stop doing that, every admin on here doesn't need to know my personal information. he did it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Materialscientist#Sock PopeyetheSailorMan90 (talk) 18:39, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But if I am going to make an unblock request to edit the site again, can you guy's unblock my talk page on my regular account? PopeyetheSailorMan90 (talk) 19:07, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Hampshire has over 1.3 million people. That's not "giving out were I live and stuff." And anyone can easily find the location of an IP address. Sundayclose (talk) 20:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PopeyetheSailorMan90 what is your "regular account"? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I don't even care how many times you guy's keep removing my edits, I'm just going to keep putting them back. You guy's have so much wrong and missing information here on Wikipedia, I will not rest until every actor article and other article's information on here say's the way it is like before in the past, I'll create as many accounts as I want. Sockpuppeting is a stupid rule anyways. We all have every right to fix what ever we want. Oh ya I forgot, You guy don't accept freedom of speech do you. MarnetteD is wrong with his information and I'm right, besides he vandalizes articles all the time, he/she thinks everything is unsourced on every article, when every time when someone makes an edit an article, he changes it back 5 seconds later over and over, because he doesn't like that user's edit. Besides, you guy's are not doing your job to protect the articles from him. If I was admin, I would block him immediately. For example you guy's blocked him a few times for vandalism back in 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2012 here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3AMarnetteD. I'm not going to go through all this again like you guy's did too my good friend Jaredgk2008 and Cebr1979. I can see how Cebr1979 is feeling just recently, because I went through the same situation he did. I'll edit when I want to ******* edit! Have fun framing people like you guy's alway's do. PopeyetheSailorMan90 (talk) 19:31, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MarnetteD was never blocked for vandalism. The first block was accidental and was intended for another user. The remainder of the blocks were for edit warring. Just sayin'. --MuZemike 23:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 19:55, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]