User talk:Potato kid

October 2018

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Hurricane Maria. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 00:41, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Varekai—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Varekai, you may be blocked from editing. Dorsetonian (talk) 00:01, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Dorsetonian (talk) 00:02, 7 March 20 20 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Potato kid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't do anything Potato kid (talk) 18:39, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You realise we can see the history of your edits, right? And that we can clearly see you are lying? Yamla (talk) 18:48, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

New Accounts

Please don't create new accounts to circumvent the block. we will yust block them as well until foreever and it will reduce your chances of ever getting unblocked. Note that you are not allowed to have a new active account while this one is blocked, and I saw already cases where constructive accounts got blocked foreever for being identified as alternate accounts of vandalism-only-accounts. Your choice Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:38, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

creffett (talk) 18:09, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]