User talk:Priya jain1002001

August 2013

Hello, I'm Vigyani. I wanted to let you know that your recent contributions have been reverted or removed because they could be seen to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 04:38, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pappu. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 03:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pappu, you may be blocked from editing. Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 15:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

why?

why r u inserting defamatory content ? --Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 15:53, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi , because in India Mr Rahul Gandhi is known as pappu. haven't you heard about "WhereIsPappu" which was the trending hash tag abt Mr. Rahul Gandhi. i am not at all posting defamatory content, nor i am abusing anybody. its a serious post. in fact in the wiki article abt pappu you will find so many (in fact most) occurrence of Mr Gandhi.

I very well know that he is nicknamed pappu on internet/twitter by his critics. But that does not make it his name. That particular section is about people, who official name contains the word Pappu. not about people who are referred so by their critics. Lots of other politicians are referred by various words, but that doesn't make them their name. In the first para of the article, mentioning that #pappu was trending etc is okay, because that is a fact. But his name is not pappy. There is difference between two things.--Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 17:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Rahul Gandhi. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Pappu shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:22, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

no chance of reverting .. as the information that i have put is absolutely correct. You can yourself verify that it by goggling it.

Discuss it on the article's talk page. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:55, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pappu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 11:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Priya_jain1002001 reported by User:NeilN (Result: ). Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:27, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Black Kite (talk) 13:42, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Priya jain1002001, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 04:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Priya jain1002001, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 12:57, 25 August 2013 (UTC)