User talk:PunjabiEditor69

July 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My intent was simply to add an article about my village and other nearby villages in Pakistan. Given that these small villages are relatively unknown, reliable sources are unfortunately scarce. PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 17:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PunjabiEditor69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize sincerely for my misuse of multiple accounts, a violation born from my misunderstanding of Wikipedia's rules. I assure you this was not done with malicious intent and I deeply regret any disruption caused. Moving forward, I commit to strictly adhering to Wikipedia's policies and contributing positively. I respectfully request the consideration of my unblock appeal. PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 17:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I was prepared to accept this unblock appeal as an honest gesture of your good intent, but then my use of the checkuser tool determined that you have been evading the block since you posted this unblock request. I have no option other than to decline the request - we need volunteers here to be honest about their activities. Girth Summit _(blether) 19:58, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PunjabiEditor69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administration, I am writing to appeal the ban that was placed on my account due to my unawareness of Wikipedia's policies. I deeply regret my actions, which involved creating multiple accounts and attempting to evade the block out of my eagerness to contribute. I now recognize the seriousness of my mistakes and the need of following Wikipedia's rules. I truly regret for any inconvenience caused, and I want to reassure you that I'm committed to learning from this experience and never break the guidelines again. If given the chance, I will commit to abiding by the rules, making a constructive contribution, and disseminating truthful information about the villages in my nation. I kindly request a reconsideration of the ban, as I genuinely hope to rectify my mistakes and contribute meaningfully to Wikipedia's community. PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 10:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This adds nothing significant to your last unblock request. I think your best bet is to go six months without any further sockpuppetry or evasion (i.e. zero edits), then apply under WP:SO. Yamla (talk) 12:37, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PunjabiEditor69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Administration,

Please unban me. I assure you that I harbor no malicious intent. The only mistake I made was creating multiple accounts. Initially, I edited with my IP because I forgot about the necessity of creating an account. To hide my IP address on Wikipedia, I decided to create an account. Later, I logged out and created another account to observe my edits. I then inadvertently forgot and started editing using that account. I promise that my intentions are not malicious. Moving forward, I will adhere strictly to the guidelines. Please give me another chance, I will improve Wikipedia by my edits. PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 10:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, you just got caught evading your block a few days ago. Go six months without IP block evasion or sock puppetry, and we'll reconsider. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:07, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PunjabiEditor69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to share the story (updated). I just saw the history of my IP address and found that someone was editing on this IP from a lot earlier. My first edit was on Chak 42/12.L a few days ago. As I said in the previous appeal that I made the account to hide IP address not to make multiple accounts. After the ban, as I was editing then suddenly I got blocked so I thought that the admin caught me that I am trying to edit while I am blocked, I got the error that this account is blocked. Actually what happened was that another person from my IP address edited after my block. It wasn't me, I didn't know about it. He is an expert and edits sometimes. You can see the history of the IP address that he mostly edits articles related to cricket, cricket players etc. I am new and I am learning Wikipedia, that's why I made that mistake. I want to add articles about villages near my village. The people of these villages don't know much about Wikipedia editing, there are only few who are educated and know about Wikipedia. Please unban me and give me a chance. Regards, PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 17:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

With TPA (justly) revoked as a result of this WP:BROTHER-esque explanation, there is no point in leaving this request open. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:31, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Enough is enough. I've revoked TPA.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:05, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chak 83/12L has been accepted[edit]

Chak 83/12L, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 22:07, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #82965 [edit]

is open. Restoration of talk page access under consideration.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:08, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring talk page access. Consultatory notification, @Bbb23:-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:20, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User has checked the calendar and wishes to wait till 16 January 2024. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:08, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

PunjabiEditor69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrator, my account was blocked on 16 July 2023 for abusing multiple accounts. I want to appeal my account block using WP:SO. At that time, I was new on Wikipedia and didn't know the guidelines and abused multiple accounts. I want to apologize for abusing the unblock requests and multiple accounts. I have read the Wikipedia guidelines carefully and now I will not abuse multiple accounts or break any rule of Wikipedia. I want to make articles about villages in Pakistan. There are not that many editors in Wikipedia and no one is currently actively working on villages in Pakistan. You can check that I made a page about a village named Chak 83/12L on and I want to make more. I haven't edited a single page for the 6 months. I really want to contribute to Wikipedia. If you see me doing anything wrong, then ban me and I will not complain. Please give me a chance to edit. Thanks.

Accept reason:

Looks good. You are ready. Welcome back.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 09:36, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock discussion[edit]

Looks good on the surface. Awaiting further discussion. Awaiting input from blocking admin. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW:. Considering unblock. Could you check to see if I've missed anything? Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: It's been so long that I had almost forgotten about this case. It was interesting to be reminded of what I wrote almost a month and a half ago. However, getting back on topic, I don't see anything that you have missed. JBW (talk) 21:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]