User talk:Quinn20003

Welcome!

Hello, Quinn20003, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like James Scott Cooper, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DFS454 (talk) 20:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of James Scott Cooper[edit]

A tag has been placed on James Scott Cooper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DFS454 (talk) 20:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with James Scott Cooper, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DFS454 (talk) 21:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent disruptive editing, removing valid speedy deletion tags, and attempting to add copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tan | 39 21:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Quinn20003 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for deleting the notices, did not realise that this would happen. I was trying to upload this for a school project that has to be submitted in 2 hours and would like another chance to upload my entry. I will rewrite the entry with absolutely no copyright infringments. Thank you

Decline reason:

Per Jayron32's note below. —Travis ^talk 00:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Is your assignment to upload pages onto Wikipedia? --Smashville^talk 21:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned several times and yet you did not heed the warnings. Tell you what. Create the entry you wish to add to Wikipedia below, along with proper references to your source material. If you can show us that you know the difference between research and plagarism, there is a good chance you can be unblocked (pending, of course, the agreement of the admin that blocked you). --Jayron32.talk.contribs 22:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Quinn20003 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I tried to upload my entry again after it was completely revised. It follows all guidelines and does not infringe upon any copyright laws. It would be greatly appreciated if you could unblock me so i could enter my entry and contribute to the website. Thank you for your time.

Decline reason:

Please read the answer that Jayron32 has already given above. Leave your article draft here on this page, below this message. After you comply with his request, you may be unblocked. EdJohnston (talk) 01:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

James Scott Cooper Submitted by: Brenden Quinn James Cooper was a very influential prohibition figure that gained prosperity through the prohibition era. Born in London, Ontario in 1874, Cooper became one of the wealthiest and most powerful bootleggers in Canada. Although he never carried alcohol in his person, Cooper found loopholes in the law. This loophole allowed him to sell and deliver liquor to Ontario residents legally. Ontario had voted for prohibition in October 1919. This law lay out that residents were allowed to purchase liquor for private use only. Saloons, bars were closed, and the only way to consume alcohol was in the privacy of the individual’s home. Because Cooper discovered there was nothing to prevent Ontario distilleries from completing any orders not originating in Ontario, he opened an office across the river in Detroit. By taking orders by phone from customers in Windsor, Cooper was allowed to produce and provide alcohol to his customers. By Working on a commission basis for Hiram Walker, and a director for Dominion Distillery products, Cooper moved away from traditional aspects of bootlegging and was known as the businessman of bootlegging. James Scott Cooper was indeed the link between the customers and the companies. On average he managed to make one dollar per case for his work. Although much of Cooper’s fortune was made through bootlegging, he was also one of the leading innovators for farming in southern Ontario. In 1918, Cooper bought 105 acres of farm near Belle River and tiled the acreage so that spring crops could be ready approximately two weeks sooner. This new visionary style of field draining used clay tiles, and created a new era of farming for the community. Tiling was an expensive and unknown reality at the time, but it was a revolutionary agricultural practice. It was exactly what the farming community of Essex County was looking for. The new tiling experiment was quickly noticed by neighbouring farms and word spread rapidly through southern Ontario. Using his business intuition, Cooper started the construction of a tiling factory on his own farm. A project that very rapidly was creating 10 thousand tiles and 20 thousand bricks a day. He initiated the widespread practice of deep ploughing and revolutionised farming. To add to his stature Cooper also built the Belle River Seed and Grain Company. Being the influential figure he was, James Scott Cooper built several businesses, including a mansion in Walkerville that has since been torn down, and a two-story building in Belle River. Formally the Cooper Hotel, the Cooper Court was constructed in 1920 at a cost of 40 thousand dollars. This local bar is still open for business to this current date, offering only OV on tap. Throughout his wealth Cooper resisted the temptation to invest in the stock market. He was one of the very few wealthy men in the late 1920’s and 1930’s to keep his wealth through the October 1929 stock market crash.

References Gervais, C.H Marty The Rumrunners: A prohibition scrapbook, 1980 Hallowell, Gerald Prohibition in Canada, The Canadian Encyclopedia. Hurtig1988. Landale, Laryssa. The Walkerville Times: Prohibition Series. Issue 33, April CBC News, A timeline of prohibition and liquor legislation in Canada, June 2005 Mcleod, Susan Prohibition: No liqueur allowed, August 8th, 2007

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Lesson learned...

Request handled by: Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed this request on hold. I have contacted the admin who initially blocked you, as I think this is acceptable. This is standard practice to involve the initial blocking admin in the decision to unblock. Please await his response. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it, Jayron. Of course, I leave any tutoring on WP:N, WP:CITE and formatting to you :-) Tan | 39 04:14, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you are unblocked[edit]

Go ahead and post the article. If you need some help formatting it and cleaning it up, you may want to glance at some other articles to see how most articles are organized, linked, formatted, and referenced. See also WP:CITE and WP:MOSLINK and WP:LAYOUT for some basic information on making an article compliant with our Manual of Style. If you have any specific questions, feel free to ask me, and I will do my best to help out. Good luck and happy editing. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~{{Hangon}}~~ Please don't delete, it says that it's going to get deleted for being similar to the deleted entry. I can't change that it's similar it has the same basis of information. Please allow to remain posted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quinn20003 (talk • contribs)

The page is not currently tagged for deletion. The notice you see at the top of the article is a series of cleanup tags. See below for more information. Politizer ^talk/_contribs 05:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article cleanup[edit]

Hi Quinn, please see the cleanup tags at the top of the article and try to address the issues mentioned there. There are links in the cleanup tags to explain words you might not be familiar with (such as "peacock terms"); if there's anything you still don't understand, you can contact me at User talk:Politizer. You should also visit the Wikipedia tutorial to learn how to add footnotes, etc. Politizer ^talk/_contribs 05:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great article, Quinn! It still needs some work but it is an excellent start. I did a bit of minor copyediting and wikified some links. Tan | 39 06:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

nominating your new article for the DYK section of the main page...[edit]

Hi. I've nominated James Scott Cooper, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 18:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of James Scott Cooper[edit]

Hello! Your submission of James Scott Cooper at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jappalang (talk) 00:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]