User talk:RPipiens

Hello, I'm Edgar181. I noticed that you recently removed content from Trodusquemine without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:07, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Squalamine, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:24, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Potential conflict of interest

I'd like to ask you if you have any connection to Michael Zasloff. There have editors here that say they have been contacted by representatives of Zasloff regarding editing Wikipedia articles, so if this is the case with you, please be aware that Wikipedia policy requires that you disclose that relationship. Relevant details can be found at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. I know this work very well and misinformation has nothing to do with conflict of interest

January 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Trodusquemine. _{Adotchar| reply here} 15:40, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK. How can one correct the horrific Wiki pages? They are filled with misinformation. Does this represent the overall quality of Wikipedia?

I see you're on now, probably reading this. Give me a moment to check the edits please, I"ll get back to you here. _{Adotchar| reply here} 15:48, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Philadelphia Business Journal, Genaera closed in 2009 and never released the drug. Instead of simply removing the section, add information about who is producing it and researching it today, as from a quick google search it looks like a few companies are. _{Adotchar| reply here} 15:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the articles' talk pages to discuss potential problems with their content. You'll find that other editors are willing to work with you if you take the time to explain yourself and provide reliable sources to back up the changes you would like see. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]