User talk:RQParks

Welcome!

Hello, RQParks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Living theory approach have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. RedUser (talk) 00:47, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello, I'm RedUser. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Living theory approach, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RedUser (talk) 00:49, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Living educational theory. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 22:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! RQParks, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 22:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Living educational theory

Hello RQParks, I'm just a watcher of the article Living educational theory, so I can't comment on the article's content, but if you want to share your concerns to the broader Wikipedia community and potentially more knowledgeable people, you can use the article's talk page (see also Help:Talk pages and WP:TPG). Talk pages are used instead of article space for meta-discussions of the article (e.g. how to improve an article, potential sources and revisions, etc.). If you want to start a draft, you can use a user sandbox to showcase your proposed changes. If you have any questions about the above links, feel free to leave me a message. Me, Myself & I (☮) (talk) 23:06, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]