User talk:RYAZZ

RYAZZ, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi RYAZZ! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

June 2017

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Krrish (franchise), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: [1] Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Statements of fact about future events need to be back up with references. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:12, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, your edits here are unsourced, but more importantly, you should probably refrain from adding future sequels to lists like this, since anything could happen and the film might never be made. Waiting until the film has started shooting, or even until it's released, is the more judicious approach, because it prevents us from prematurely listing films that don't actually exist. To give you an idea of where the film article community's head is on this issue: when we create film articles on future films, the bare minimum threshold for creation, is that filming has to begin. WP:NFF says:

"Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing" production. Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available. Sources must be used to confirm the start of principal photography after shooting has begun."

As you can see, the community doesn't want us jumping the gun on planned films. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:20, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Justice League question

Where did you find out Justice League is 180 minutes long? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.121.193 (talk) 14:18, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Indian film series

Hi, you add some film series in bollywood. They are not sequels of that films. If you add as they are film series then please add appropriate source. Thank you. Sush150 (talk) 18:50, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. How to add source. And they are unofficial film series. Just like ABCD-STREET DANCER 3D Series. RYAZZ (talk) 04:12, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please add appropriate source. The makers of films not saying it's sequel of film. Sush150 (talk) 14:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Baaghi (film series). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Hate Story 4 into Hate Story (film series). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:56, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Commando (film series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Action

Yamla Pagla Deewana (film series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vishal Mishra

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [2][3] Being able to properly identify quality sources is very important at Wikipedia. Sacnilk.com, a faceless entity, doesn't meet with our standards. See WP:RS, and familiarise yourself with some examples of sources that are and are not suitable at WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kyaa Kool Hain Hum 3, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Diff: [4] I'm sorry if the clear English was confusing to you, but there is an inherent problem with Box Office India's budget figures, which is detailed in that maintenance template, but can also be researched at WT:ICTF if you are so interested. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:13, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hera Pheri (2000 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [5] This change is indistinguishable from vandalism, when I compare it to this source. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note also that re: this, being able to identify quality references is crucial to your ability to edit here constructively. Bestoftheyear.in, a faceless blog/content aggregator, doesn't come close to satisfying our reliable sourcing guidelines. I strongly recommend you quickly get up to speed on Wikipedia's sourcing requirements. See WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources for a general list of Indian entertainment sources that are considered suitable. Repeated submission of poor sources will very quickly result in your editing privileges being interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:18, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: these changes, you really shouldn't make changes if you don't know what you're doing. See MOS:COMMONALITY and don't arbitrarily change millions to crore. You also removed a reference with no justification, that was supporting content that you previously fabricated. Further, it's unclear how you are deciding that Neeraj Vora has a story credit when the film was allegedly based on a 1989 film. How does that work exactly? You should be using edit summaries to explain your changes. If you continue to make bizarre, counter-intuitive or otherwise problematic edits, your editing access will be interrupted to prevent damage to the encyclopedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:55, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I found the details on Box Office India. I thought it is a minor changes that is why I didn't proved any reference. Plus It is a Bollywood Movie, an Indian movie. And we Indians prefer Crore instead of Millions. That's why I'm changing Millions to Crore. I'm just trying to make those pages good. Next time I will try to add reference for every single changes. RYAZZ (talk) 20:40, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In Bollywood movies. We included Movie Making Cost and Marketing Cost in Budget. I don't know where to find them separately. Tell me where to I will add according to that. And Box Office India is a very reliable source I think. That's why I'm adding everything What I found on this website. RYAZZ (talk) 20:42, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your reply. I've explained each of these issues to you. Budget should not include print and advertising. That's not done anywhere else in the world, and it is impossible to compare the success of movies like Dangal to western films when India doesn't consistently use the same metrics that the entire rest of the world uses. Box Office India is unique in that they mash these numbers together. Bollywood Hungama doesn't seem to do this. I've seen several other mainstream Indian news outlets with budget figures that were significantly less than Box Office India's, implying that this isn't a widespread practice. Whether or not Indians prefer "crore" is of no consequence. This is an encyclopedia for a global audience, not just Indians. Personally, I find it easier to use crore because that's what we typically find in articles, but if I find "millions" already present, I won't change it. Lastly, I don't just want you to add references, I want you to add quality references. I have also pointed you twice to a list of sources that are sufficient. Nobody faults you for not knowing all the rules when you start editing at Wikipedia, but persistent failure to adhere to the guidelines is ultimately disruptive. I'm sure that's not what you are trying to be. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:02, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stars

Re: this, the |starring= parameter is for the name of people who are credited as stars of this film. "Star" is a special credit that typically coincides with whomever is playing the lead roles. In an ensemble cast, where there are multiple actors whose characters are of equal weight and importance, we might have many names in this parameter, but in a film where there are clearly one or two lead actors, we would not populate this field with the names of supporting actors. "Star" ≠ appears in. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:10, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir.. Thank you RYAZZ (talk) 16:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, don't remove templates if you don't know what purpose they serve. The {{ubl}} template you removed in that edit is preferred over straight <br> HTML formatting, in part because it helps lists appear in a tighter formation over loose HTML line breaks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox film

Please read the instructions at Template:Infobox film. It's getting a bit tiresome to have to keep correcting every wrong decision you make. With regard to this edit, the |music= parameter is intended for the score composer. Adding song composers is a secondary, off-label usage. The parameter instructions very clearly say "songwriters should not be included", so the mere fact that any of the incidental song composers are in that parameter is an exception, but it certainly shouldn't take priority over the score composer. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you ever steal content like you did here at Raid (2018 film) where rather than write a summary in your own words, you copied the bulk of this article, your editing privileges will be permanently interrupted. DO NOT COPY. This is a basic concept in academia. Don't copy of the kid sitting next to you, don't copy out of the encyclopedia. DO NOT COPY. This is a copyright violation and plagiarism. I'm serious about this. People lose their careers over this sloppy shit. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise what I did in Raid page. But what's wrong with "Aashiqui 2"? I just reversed Score and Songs name. That's it. And why I did this. Coz in every page. The Songs section comes first then the Score section. Ok I do nothing in any page. What bout the page "Baaghi (film series)" somebody is putting just wrong info. And you're doing nothing about it. That page was made by me. And someone editing it without any references. See. The page. And the sources of the page. "Baaghi", "Baaghi 2" and "Baaghi 3" I won't touch anyone pages. But plz I don't want anyone to edit my created pages. Cause I'm taking full care of my pages. I'm not good at writing. Sorry again. I won't touch anyone pages. RYAZZ (talk) 16:17, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to List of Indian film series does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Hemantha (talk) 08:12, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Indian film series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yaariyan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]