User talk:Raam2

Raam2, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Raam2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you.

This is your first warning, do not attempt to add undue weight or blatant original research as you have just done on Talk:Hinduism. If continued you will be blocked and possibly topic banned. AcidSnow (talk) 23:46, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My friends say it is okay to discuss anything on a Talk Page, but I will read up the links you have posted also.–Raam2 (talk) 14:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who your "friend" is but that's not true at all. Talk pages are not forums. Anyways, it does not seem you have read the links that I have provided you. The same rules regarding disruptive edits apply there as does an actual article edit. AcidSnow (talk) 19:19, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Articles on Wikipedia do not give fringe material equal weight to majority viewpoints; content in articles are given representation in proportion to their prominence. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This is your second warning on your talk page. You have already been warned here and on the respective talk pages. Specifically these edits,[1][2] none of those reports were official but just an individuals claim. Regardless if it's "sourced" it does not make it reliable let alone true. Also please don't spam us with links that you have not read, like you did here.[3] AcidSnow (talk) 19:19, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Sandstein 19:44, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]