User talk:RadioIzzy

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Relapse (album) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 19:10, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Stan (song). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 19:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Taylor Kinney, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Taylor Kinney was changed by RadioIzzy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870295 on 2012-03-12T22:13:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:13, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Recovery (Eminem album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dan56 (talk) 02:14, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hi,,,,,,,,,,,,could you add michael jackson ,,,,,,,,,History past present and future book 1

hi,,,,,,,,,,,i cant edit the best selling album list,,,,,could you add michael jacksons History album with 20 million,,,,,,,,thanks--65.8.191.18 (talk) 15:20, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Selena Gomez because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:44, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of best-selling albums, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 17:52, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of best-selling albums. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 20:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of best-selling albums. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 01:58, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:10, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And now, just as soon as your block expired, you made the same type of unsourced edits again. I've reblocked you for a week. You have to stop this. If you resume edit warring again after the block is up, I'll very likely make the next block indefinite. Instead, what you have to do, as has been explained several times above, is go to the article's talk page and discuss the matter; be prepared with reliable sources to support your position. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:01, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]