User talk:Rafe101

Hello, Rafe101 and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Red Director (talk) 15:43, 19 May 2018 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raquel DiDomenico has been accepted

Raquel DiDomenico, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:26, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Splitting discussion for Clitoris

An article that you have edited or that may interest you, (Clitoris), has content that I have proposed to be removed and moved to another article, (Human clitoris). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 05:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your edits to Glans penis

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Glans penis, you may be blocked from editing. 223.136.117.195 (talk) 09:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

I did intend to vandalize. I believed I added additional information Rafe101 (talk) 09:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

• not

important omission Rafe101 (talk) 09:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

"Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. For example, edit warring over how exactly to present encyclopedic content is not vandalism. Careful consideration may be required to differentiate between edits that are beneficial, edits that are detrimental but well-intentioned, and edits that are vandalism. If it is clear that an editor is intending to improve Wikipedia, their edits are not vandalism, even if they violate some core policy of Wikipedia. Mislabeling good faith edits "vandalism" can be harmful, as it makes users less likely to respond to corrective advice or to engage collaboratively during a disagreement. For that reason, avoid using the term "vandalism" unless it is clear the user means to harm Wikipedia" Rafe101 (talk) 17:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

I think I see the problem—well—what happened. No idea about the actual problem. I was logged in. I have no idea why it logged me as anonymous and all the other edits listed under that IP address were not mine. I know nothing about Czech football or Indian politics. I did not make anonymous edits. Rafe101 (talk) 20:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

(passing-by user) I think the problem, actually, is that the IP is just trolling. They are now blocked for disruptive editing and their previous IP (223.136.110.159) was already blocked for it – there was nothing wrong with your placement of the image (I'd say your placement was better, even), just like there was nothing wrong with most other edits that they reverted and warned for, certainly none were vandalism.

– 143.208.236.146 (talk) 20:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for that.

I don't know why I got caught up in that IP shenanigans. I didn't see anything wrong with articles about Czech football players either, just that I had nothing to do with it. Rafe101 (talk) 20:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)