User talk:Rahulshahx99
Welcome[edit]
Hi, Rahulshahx99. Welcome to Wikipedia!
I hope you like it here and decide to stick around. If you see something on Wikipedia that you want to change, just press the edit button and change it!
For the basic principles, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. And if you're ready to make some edits, this Wikipedia cheatsheet may come in handy.
Cheers, ChzzBot IV (talk) 12:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International University Rankings - new entrant. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.
Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.
Here's an example of how to add references:
He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>
== References ==
{{reflist}}
That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.
Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help connect.
Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 12:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
{{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International University Rankings - new entrant.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
{{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International University Rankings - new entrant.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:11, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
{{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/International University Rankings - new entrant.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:35, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Study Group International - incomplete AfD nomination[edit]
Hello Rahulshahx99, I noticed you tried to nominate this article for AfD but didn't finish steps 2 and 3 of the nomination process - I have reverted the erroneous nomination for now. If you'd like to re-nominate the article, please follow all 3 steps as described in WP:AFDHOWTO. On a quick sidenote, "being an advertisement" is usually not a sufficient reason for deletion, if the article also contains encyclopedic content and is not entirely promotional. In such a case re-phrasing and/or trimming the promotional parts is the preferred solution. I have already tried to remove some of the excessive details in earlier edits. But further improvements would of course be welcome - the article could certainly use more work. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 14:54, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Karan Gupta Education Foundation[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Karan Gupta Education Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CataracticPlanets (talk) 02:18, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
November 2022[edit]
Hello Rahulshahx99. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rahulshahx99. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rahulshahx99|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE (talk) 10:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hello SmartSE, I am not being paid directly or indirectly for my edits. The only interest I have in this topic is that I am a student in India and I have special interest in career counselling and people who work with education. I follow a select group of people and like to make edits about them. I categorically deny being paid or having any unethical interest in this matter and am happy to submit any proof including my bank statements to support my claim. I am also not an expert editor but know basic editing. If would be kind enough to point me in some direction so as to sound more neutral, I would appreciate that. Truth Prevails 08:11, 18 November 2022 (UTC)