User talk:RandomXYZb/Archive 9

Jeff Cage

please tell me exactly what I am doing wrong. I have read through all this info. I understand autobio is frowned on but I have been careful to follow the rules. this is really hurting my head.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcage (talk • contribs) --Jcage (talk) 22:31, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello Giles! Long time no speak! How are you? Been deleting any more web pages? :P I hope not —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alice Street (talk • contribs) 14:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Asugff/Hytioplion

Yes, this person has been extensively warned under both guises. Are you efficient at the AIV procedure? If so, please take charge.—DCGeist (talk) 18:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Discussions with a sockpuppet

Can you prove the image is appropriate there? Asugff (talk) 18:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

What is the justification of the claim in the caption John Alton, the creator of many of film noir's iconic images. Is there any evidence supporting this fact? Asugff (talk) 18:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

There is no sentence in the article supporting this fact. He photographed some of the most famous film noirs of the classic period this sentence is present here without any citation. Asugff (talk) 18:31, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Adding citation needed is disruptive? Asugff (talk) 18:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

What the hell you motherfucker doing? Why removing citation? Asugff (talk) 18:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

What the hell you motherfuckers, you son of a bitch is doing there? Asugffff (talk) 19:10, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

The article on Alton is written as advertisement.FucingDCGeist (talk) 19:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

The selected filmography portion?What does it mean? Selected what? Advertisement. Newasder (talk) 19:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

The films associated with Alton are written like advertisements. I will edit them.Newasder (talk) 19:39, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Extraweightage is given on the films associated with Alton. Newasder (talk) 19:46, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Your revert on my user page

I thank you for this reversion. I've been gathering attention lately from vandals. Must mean I'm doing something right. :) Cheers! Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 22:11, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Help me

Thanks for the link. But, it has nothing that says "the licensing tag of this image is wrong" or something like that. I have found webpage screenshots, cropped down to the banner that are tagged as logo. The banners do have logos on them, but has a lot more information as well, like a background gradient, the name of the organization written in large bold type and so on. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 06:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Quick note: Nerge

I removed your CSD on Nerge, as the revision you tagged was the result of vandalism, and not an attack page. Cheers :) --slakr^\ talk / 11:18, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Heh, no worries— I've made the same mistake :P --slakr^\ talk / 11:20, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Henry Exelby

Why do u want to delete our article i dont get it at all its absurd It provids knowledge for west sussex people who are intrested in SimWhiteHouse do you see me going through deleting stuff of yours it is also written perfectly stop being imature or Ill report you to the Real Admin!!!!!!!!!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.84.103.196 (talk • contribs)

OK, from holmes.sherlock

Ok, i know now.

h.s. (for short) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Holmes.sherlock (talk • contribs) 13:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Suck my boles, bitch

I can just change my IP adress anytime I want, so go ahead and ban me, cunt. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.176.149.218 (talk • contribs)

thanks

thanks for heading me in the right direction so I could change my username. --MKnight9989 14:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

SORRY

SORRY --FordredAran (talk) 18:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)--FordredAran (talk) 18:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Your message

What ARE you going on about? And what does spam from New Zealand have to do with, well, anything whatsoever? --221.114.141.220 (talk) 13:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Got our feedback, much appreciated. Looked at your contribs: you work hard here. Enjoy the festive season too. Martin 16:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpurdy (talk • contribs) Or .. --Martin ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 18:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

template coding help

So now that you have done that, can you apply it to the real template's coding? --MicroX 15:48, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I realized that what you taught me was useful. On that template I noticed that the style was align center already. So the only thing that was really needed was to extend the width of that column. I didn't extend all the way to 300, but to 220 so that it looks like a perfect fit. Thanks for your help. --MicroX 16:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

quick note re: sig

Pardon my presumption, but I think maybe your sig's contrib link overextends to its following paren when that might not be the intent?

I was browsing around to see what sorts of edits I've made in the past and noticed my interaction with you earlier. Thanks for the help then. I checked your contribs page... You keep busy, it seems. Good Samaritanism multiplied by OCD?

—63.249.110.32 (talk) 08:10, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Mike Score

i DONT KNOW IF i AM DOING THIS RIGHT..PERHAPS NOT. Sorry Cap Lock! I have posted the truth here on this site in regards to a Mike Score..he lists his DOB as 1957 it is 1952 You can verify it thru Florida and his drivers license. This man has swindled myself and my daughter out of over 40,000 . He manages to do it with a lot of smooth talking and I will get the papers to you tomorrow. He did this at a time of grief. Hence as an Atty you know how difficult and what a long path it is going to be to recover any of these funds. He has caused us extreme hardship and duress. As a public figure he is responsible for his actions and if he wants his name posted on the internet well than it will be posted with the truth. He is up on a number of cases in Florida at this time and mine is about to be filed. Just go to the Brevard County Clerk of Courts site. There you will find ALL the public information including his DOB and his Drivers license info. After that you can wander ocver to the Seminole County Clerks office and find more of the same. It is just a shame I didnt have the sense nor the determination to do the above before I lent him the money. Tuesday is xmas and there are no gifts for my 11 year old due to this man.—Preceding unsigned comment added by SpeakerOfTruthnotTold (talk • contribs)

Well tell me then if his DOB is backed up thru the correct authorities why can it not be posted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SpeakerOfTruthnotTold (talk • contribs) 17:10, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

So then you are telling me the it is wrong to tell the truth even if it is backed up by vital statistics? Big Brother????—Preceding unsigned comment added by SpeakerOfTruthnotTold (talk • contribs)

okey dokey i think i will save that verifiable ling for just now.—Preceding unsigned comment added by SpeakerOfTruthnotTold (talk • contribs)

Random comment

LOLWUT WIKIPEDIA IS SO MUCH FUN TO FUCK AROUND WITH —Preceding unsigned comment added by MVJ52197 (talk • contribs)

Guess what

It's my talk page and I can do whatever I want with it. Steg Blob (talk) 17:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Username block

Of course, I see it now and have acted accordingly. Apologies for not seeing that, for some reason the talk page didn't load up as anything other than a red link when I was last at UAA. All's well in the end. --SGGH ^speak! 18:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

why did you remove the image

i was trying to be bold by adding it more discreetly, lower in the text and hidden like in the article anal-oral contact.Ah0000000ga (talk) 23:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

would you answer? thanksAh0000000ga (talk) 23:29, 22 December 2007 (UTC)=)

I have responded on my talk page.Ah0000000ga (talk) 23:39, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry you felt chased, i can see how "would you answer" made you feel that way. I just didn't know how to say that i had left my message on my page. I did feel a sense of urgency since i was surprised that i had allegedly violated 3rr. also i like to have the whole discussion in one place. this time i've duplicated it on both talk pagesAh0000000ga (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

David Helfgott

I don't think it[ ' ]s vandalism, but I'm not sure its appropriate for the article in question, so its removal should stand, in my view.

Whether or not it's of vital importance to the article is arguable, I suppose, but I still think that if DH's doctor Chris Reynolds is mentioned at all, it's interesting & important for readers to know something about who he is (what kind of a doctor etc. -- particularly as he is not exactly a mainstream physician). Surely the clearest way to do this is to include a link to his website, given that he doesn't have an entry of his own on Wikipedia? I suppose one could say "complementary medicine practitioner" or something like that, but again, the website link would make it far easier to understand.

My own inclination would be to revert your edit and retain the link I added -- although I do also think the whole section could be rewritten to make the sequence of events clearer. Judging by the data given, he was in London 1966-69 and met Chris Reynolds in around 1986ish... so the info on his first marriage etc. is not really in the right position, and I don't think it even fits well within the header "London studies and mental illness" (maybe that should be retitled "London studies, mental illness and return to Australia"?)...

I'll leave it in your hands for now -- but incidentally, your edit left a superfluous closing parenthesis. Ozaru (talk) 23:25, 1 January 2008 (UTC)