User talk:Rankec.7

July 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 07:22, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Rankec.7, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 07:23, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Operation Steel '93, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prkos. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Battle of Paštrik. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Personal attacks will get you nowhere. You should not use Wikipedia for your nationalist purposes. StephenMacky1 (talk) 10:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Nationalist purposes? My Friend he is nationalist, i am totally cool, he attack me first in personal messages Rankec.7 (talk) 10:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

You are not even a Moderator on Wikipedia? I said that i want to speak to him not with you, please dont disturb me anymore. Thank you Rankec.7 (talk) 10:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Keep making personal attacks and I will take it to WP:ANI. Then you will get to speak with an administrator when they block you. Wikipedia does not have moderators. StephenMacky1 (talk) 11:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

I dont make attacks, i was joking with liars and normal editing until the albanian attacked me in personal messages, how can i speak to administrator when they block me? What are you talking about? Rankec.7 (talk) 11:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi Rankec.7! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Battle of Paštrik several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Battle of Paštrik, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Durraz0 (talk) 11:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Bro. This is stupid because i am the only one talking here, you are just reporting me and threaten like whats the point?! Rankec.7 (talk) 12:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Battle of Paštrik shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Durraz0 (talk) 11:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Lol, its funny, you albanians always need 20000 people to defend you in a argumet when you dont have one, i have nothing aginst you but you are really bad person, i must say you that Rankec.7 (talk) 11:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

stop posting here and leave me alone, bully someone else Rankec.7 (talk) 12:02, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Rankec.7 reported by User:StephenMacky1 (Result: ). Thank you. StephenMacky1 (talk) 11:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

The one violating the wiki policy is YOU. Why? Because you deny fact and valid sources with threats Rankec.7 (talk) 12:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 12:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Bravo, Congrats, now your life is fullfiled totally :) Rankec.7 (talk) 12:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

• TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)